← Snowflake Interview Insights
First thing I did was ask if cycles were possible.
Model the roles and grants as a directed graph, then compute the transitive closure of privileges using either DFS with memoization or topological sorting. For each role, union its own privileges with those of all ancestors, handling cycles if present.
Pro tip: Clarify whether the graph is a DAG or may contain cycles; if cycles are possible, use SCC condensation or iterative DFS with visited sets to avoid infinite loops. Also discuss trade-offs between time and space, and mention that bitsets can optimize union operations for large privilege sets.
Confirm the representation: privileges per role, grants as directed edges (from child to parent or vice versa), and whether cycles are possible. Ask about expected scale to choose an efficient algorithm.
Treat roles as nodes and grants as directed edges. The goal is to compute, for each node, the union of privileges of all nodes reachable via reverse edges (ancestors).
If the graph is a DAG, use topological order and propagate privilege sets from parents to children. If cycles exist, first condense SCCs or use DFS with memoization and cycle detection.
Use sets or bitsets for efficient unions. For large graphs, consider iterative DFS to avoid recursion limits, and memoize results to avoid recomputation.
Discuss time and space complexity (e.g., O(V+E) times the cost of set union). Test with edge cases: no grants, cycles, multiple parents, and large privilege sets.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.