← Google Interview Insights

Google·Software Engineer·Onsite - Multi Round·Intermediate

IntermediatePending
Sep 2024Remote

Summary

Went through the Google SWE onsite in September, two coding rounds back to back. One was manageable, the other felt like a brain teaser from another dimension. Still waiting to hear back and trying not to read too much into the silence.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Given a graph, implement a traversal to solve a medium-difficulty problem.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Felt pretty solid here.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem details and constraints, then choose the appropriate traversal (BFS or DFS) based on the graph type and problem requirements. Implement the traversal with careful attention to visited tracking and edge cases, and analyze time and space complexity.

Pro tip: Always discuss trade-offs between BFS and DFS, and mention how you would handle large graphs or disconnected components. This shows depth and practical awareness.

1. Clarify the problem

Ask questions to understand the graph representation (adjacency list/matrix), directed/undirected, connected/disconnected, and the specific goal (e.g., shortest path, cycle detection).

2. Choose traversal method

Decide between BFS and DFS based on the problem: BFS for shortest path in unweighted graphs, DFS for topological sort or cycle detection. Explain your choice.

3. Outline the algorithm

Describe the steps: initialize data structures (queue/stack, visited set), iterate through nodes, and process neighbors. Mention handling of disconnected components.

4. Implement and test

Write clean code, then walk through a small example and edge cases (empty graph, single node, cycles). Discuss time and space complexity.

5. Optimize and discuss trade-offs

Consider optimizations like early termination, bidirectional search, or iterative vs recursive DFS. Discuss trade-offs and potential improvements.

Key Points to Mention

  • Graph representation (adjacency list vs matrix) and its impact on complexity
  • Visited tracking to avoid infinite loops in cyclic graphs
  • Time and space complexity analysis (O(V+E) for both BFS and DFS)
  • Handling disconnected components by iterating over all nodes
  • Use of queue for BFS and stack/recursion for DFS
  • Edge cases: empty graph, single node, self-loops, parallel edges

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Given an array split into partitions, find an optimal solution using binary search, and then mathematically prove your solution runs better than O(n).

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This one was rough.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem: identify the array structure, partition definition, and the objective (e.g., find a partition point, search for a target). Then, design a binary search algorithm that leverages the partition property, and rigorously analyze its time complexity to prove it is better than O(n).

Pro tip: Always state the assumptions about the input (e.g., sorted partitions, monotonicity) before diving into the solution; this shows you think about edge cases and problem constraints.

1. Clarify the problem

Ask questions to understand the array structure, how partitions are defined, and what 'optimal solution' means (e.g., minimize comparisons, find a specific element).

2. Identify binary search applicability

Determine if the problem has a monotonic property or can be reduced to searching in a sorted or partially sorted structure, enabling binary search.

3. Design the algorithm

Outline the binary search steps: define search space, mid calculation, condition to move left/right, and termination. Handle edge cases like empty partitions or duplicates.

4. Prove time complexity

Show that each step halves the search space, leading to O(log n) or O(log m) where m is number of partitions, and argue why this is better than O(n).

5. Discuss trade-offs and edge cases

Mention any assumptions (e.g., sorted partitions), potential pitfalls (e.g., non-uniform partition sizes), and compare with linear scan.

Key Points to Mention

  • Monotonicity or sorted property enabling binary search
  • Time complexity analysis: O(log n) vs O(n)
  • Handling of partition boundaries and edge cases
  • Space complexity (usually O(1) for iterative binary search)
  • Comparison with linear search and when binary search is not applicable
  • Proof techniques: induction, loop invariant, or recurrence relation

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Describe a situation that demonstrates your fit with the company's values and collaborative working style.

Adaptability & Ambiguity
Author's notes

Phone screen had a behavioral component alongside the DSA question.

Create a free account to read the full note