Burned myself on the comma-splitting approach.
Clarify the grammar and constraints first, then choose a recursive descent parser or a stack-based iterative approach. Implement the parser with careful handling of nested expressions, and test with edge cases like negative numbers and whitespace.
Pro tip: Mention that you would first define a formal grammar (e.g., expression -> 'add(' expression ',' expression ')' | 'sub(' expression ',' expression ')' | number) to guide the implementation and ensure correctness.
Ask about input format, allowed operations, number types, whitespace handling, and error cases. Confirm whether the parser should handle only add/sub or be extensible.
Write a simple grammar for the expressions and decide between recursive descent, stack-based, or regex-based parsing. Explain why recursive descent is natural for nested structures.
Code the parser with a function that parses an expression, handling 'add' and 'sub' by recursively parsing arguments. Use an index or token stream to track position.
Test with simple expressions, deeply nested ones, negative numbers, and whitespace variations. Verify that evaluation returns correct results.
Talk about time/space complexity, potential stack overflow for deep nesting, and how to extend to more operations or variables.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.