← Patreon Interview Insights

Patreon·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Jun 2026

Summary

Patreon SWE interview with a coding question around org chart traversal. Pretty straightforward tree problem but the lookup requirements had a few layers worth thinking through carefully.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given an org chart as a list of [manager, direct_report] pairs, implement a lookUp(name) function that returns the person's role ('IC' or 'Manager'), their number of direct reports, and their total number of transitive reports.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

The direct report count was easy enough, just build an adjacency list.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Clarify requirements and edge cases, then design a solution that preprocesses the org chart into a graph (e.g., adjacency list) to enable efficient lookups. Implement lookUp by traversing the graph to compute direct and transitive reports, and determine role based on whether the person has direct reports. Discuss time/space trade-offs and potential optimizations like caching or memoization.

Pro tip: Proactively discuss how your solution scales to large org charts and frequent lookups, and mention that you'd validate the input for cycles or missing managers to ensure robustness.

1. Clarify requirements and edge cases

Ask about input format, expected size, frequency of lookups, and edge cases like cycles, multiple managers, or missing persons. Confirm the definition of 'role' and 'transitive reports'.

2. Choose data structures and preprocessing

Decide on an adjacency list (map from manager to list of direct reports) for efficient traversal. Consider if preprocessing (e.g., building the graph once) is acceptable.

3. Design the lookUp algorithm

For a given name, retrieve direct reports from the map. If none, role is 'IC'; else 'Manager'. Compute transitive reports via DFS/BFS from the person, counting all descendants.

4. Analyze complexity and optimize

Discuss time complexity: O(1) for direct reports, O(N) for transitive reports in worst case. Suggest memoization or caching for repeated lookups, and consider space-time trade-offs.

5. Handle edge cases and validate

Address cycles (use visited set), missing managers (treat as roots), and multiple managers (if allowed, decide on representation). Test with small examples.

Key Points to Mention

  • Use of adjacency list (hash map) for O(1) access to direct reports
  • DFS/BFS for transitive reports with cycle detection
  • Role determination based on presence of direct reports
  • Time and space complexity analysis (O(N) for transitive reports, O(N) space)
  • Caching/memoization for repeated lookups to improve performance
  • Edge cases: cycles, missing managers, multiple managers, empty input

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.