The fanout piece is where I spent most of my time and also where I probably lost points.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale (e.g., millions of concurrent viewers, sub-second latency, moderation needs). Then design a scalable architecture using a pub/sub system for real-time fan-out, with components for ingestion, processing, storage, and delivery. Finally, discuss trade-offs and optimizations for moderation, rate limiting, and replay.
Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of partitioning by video stream and using a push-based model (e.g., WebSockets) for low latency, while also considering a hybrid approach with long polling for fallback. Show awareness of cost and complexity trade-offs.
Ask questions to understand expected scale (e.g., millions of concurrent viewers per stream, comment rate), latency requirements (e.g., <1s), moderation needs, and replay window. Define functional and non-functional requirements.
Propose a microservices-based architecture with components: API gateway for ingestion, message queue (e.g., Kafka) for buffering, stream processing for moderation/rate limiting, pub/sub (e.g., Redis Pub/Sub) for fan-out, and WebSocket servers for delivery. Include storage for replay (e.g., time-series DB or Redis).
Detail how each component works: ingestion API handles auth and rate limiting; moderation service uses ML models and user reports; pub/sub partitions by stream ID; WebSocket servers maintain connections and push comments; storage retains recent comments for replay.
Discuss scaling strategies: horizontal scaling of WebSocket servers, sharding by stream, using CDN for static assets, and caching. Trade-offs: push vs. pull, consistency vs. latency, cost of moderation.
Cover rate limiting per user/IP, spam detection, handling sudden spikes, and replay API design. Mention optimizations like batching, compression, and fallback to polling.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.