← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Software Engineer·Onsite - Coding / Algorithms·Senior

Senior
Jun 2026

Summary

Meta SWE coding round with a geometry/array problem that looks deceptively clean until you actually try to optimize it. The O(n^2) path is obvious but they clearly wanted more.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

You're given an array of mountain peak heights and a minimum index gap constraint. Find the pair of indices at least that gap apart where the absolute difference in heights is smallest, and return that minimum difference.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Started with brute force just to make sure I understood the problem, which was fine.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose a solution that balances time and space complexity. A common efficient approach is to sort the array while keeping track of original indices, then use a sliding window or two-pointer technique to find the minimum difference among pairs with index gap at least k. Discuss trade-offs between sorting and other methods like using a balanced BST or segment tree.

Pro tip: Mention that sorting changes the original order, so you must retain original indices; this shows attention to detail. Also, consider if the array is static or dynamic, as that affects the choice of data structure.

1. Clarify the problem

Restate the problem in your own words and ask clarifying questions about constraints, input size, and expected output. Confirm whether the array can be modified and if there are duplicate heights.

2. Discuss brute force and its complexity

Mention the naive O(n^2) approach of checking all pairs with index gap >= k, and its inefficiency for large n. This sets the stage for optimization.

3. Propose an optimized approach

Describe an O(n log n) solution: create pairs of (height, index), sort by height, then use a sliding window to find the minimum difference where the index gap condition is satisfied. Alternatively, use a balanced BST to maintain a window of indices.

4. Analyze trade-offs

Compare sorting-based approach with other methods like using a segment tree or heap, discussing time/space complexity and suitability for different scenarios (e.g., streaming data).

5. Handle edge cases and test

Walk through edge cases such as k=0, k>=n, all equal heights, and negative heights. Suggest testing with small examples to verify correctness.

Key Points to Mention

  • Time and space complexity of proposed solutions
  • Handling duplicate heights and ensuring correct index gap
  • Trade-offs between sorting and using a balanced BST
  • Edge cases: k=0, k>=n, empty array, single element
  • Potential for further optimization if array is sorted or has special properties
  • Importance of retaining original indices when sorting

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.