My first instinct was to just write a big if-else block and I'm glad I caught myself before saying that out loud.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a modular architecture with a central dispatcher and a bot interface, emphasizing extensibility and fault isolation. Walk through the message flow, discuss trade-offs (sync vs async, ordering, error handling), and outline how to add new bots without modifying core logic.
Pro tip: Show maturity by discussing how to handle bot failures gracefully—e.g., timeouts, circuit breakers, and dead-letter queues—so one misbehaving bot doesn't break the entire chat system.
Ask about expected message volume, latency requirements, bot response time limits, and whether responses should be aggregated or sent individually. This sets the stage for design decisions.
Design a common interface (e.g., `handleMessage(message) -> List<Response>`) that all bots implement. The dispatcher receives incoming messages and invokes all registered bots, collecting their responses.
Decide whether to process bots synchronously or asynchronously. For scalability, use a thread pool or async calls with timeouts. Ensure responses are aggregated and sent back to the user in order.
Implement error handling per bot: catch exceptions, set timeouts, and use circuit breakers. Log failures and optionally retry or dead-letter. This prevents one bot from affecting others.
Allow dynamic registration of bots via a registry (e.g., config file, service discovery). New bots just implement the interface and register; no changes to dispatcher code.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.