I knew the naive version instantly, sort the array and scan.
Use the array itself as a hash table by placing each number in its correct index (e.g., value v at index v-1) through cyclic swaps, then scan for the first index where the value doesn't match. This achieves O(n) time and O(1) space. After coding, discuss trade-offs: the in-place approach modifies the input, has a higher constant factor, and is less readable than O(n) space solutions.
Pro tip: At Apple, interviewers value clean, bug-free code and clear communication. Before coding, explicitly state that you'll modify the input array and confirm that's acceptable; then walk through edge cases like empty array, all negatives, and duplicates.
Confirm that the array can be modified and that O(1) space means no additional data structures. Discuss edge cases: empty array, all non-positive numbers, duplicates, and large values.
Describe the invariant: for an array of length n, the smallest missing positive is in [1, n+1]. Place each value v (1 ≤ v ≤ n) at index v-1 by swapping.
Iterate through the array; while the current value is in range and not already in its correct position, swap it with the element at its target index. Handle duplicates by skipping if the target already has the correct value.
After rearranging, scan the array from left to right. The first index i where nums[i] != i+1 gives the missing positive i+1. If all match, return n+1.
Explain that each element is swapped at most once, giving O(n) time. Space is O(1) since only a few variables are used. Discuss trade-offs: input mutation, higher constant factor, and reduced readability compared to O(n) space solutions.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.