← Instacart Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just randomly sample the whole list, which is wrong because you'd skew the OD distribution.
Clarify the input format and downsampling requirements, then propose a two-pass algorithm: first count events per origin-destination pair, then sample a proportional number of events from each pair. Discuss trade-offs between exact proportional sampling and approximate methods, and analyze time/space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that preserving distribution is crucial for simulation validity, and suggest using a random seed for reproducibility. Also, consider edge cases like small counts and zero counts.
Ask about the input data structure (e.g., list of events with origin and destination), the downsampling factor (e.g., reduce by 50%), and whether exact proportional representation is required or approximate is acceptable.
Propose a two-pass approach: first, count the total number of events and the count per OD pair; second, for each OD pair, randomly sample a number of events proportional to its original count, ensuring the total is reduced by the factor.
Discuss how to handle OD pairs with very few events (e.g., ensure at least one event if the pair exists, or use probabilistic rounding) and how to deal with rounding errors to match the exact target total.
Analyze time and space complexity: O(N) time for counting and O(N) for sampling, with O(K) space for counts where K is number of OD pairs. Mention that this is optimal for a single pass.
Compare exact proportional sampling (which may require careful rounding) with approximate methods like Poisson sampling or systematic sampling. Discuss memory vs. accuracy trade-offs if the dataset is too large to fit in memory.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Model the bus simulation as a state machine that processes each stop in order, maintaining passenger queues and bus occupancy. For each stop, first drop off passengers whose destination matches, then board waiting passengers up to capacity, logging each action. Use appropriate data structures like queues for waiting passengers and a set or list for onboard passengers.
Pro tip: Clarify assumptions upfront (e.g., bus capacity, passenger order, log format) and discuss trade-offs between different data structures, showing you consider real-world constraints and scalability.
Ask about input format, bus capacity, passenger ordering, and log format. Confirm whether passengers board in FIFO order and if multiple buses are involved.
Choose structures: a queue for waiting passengers per stop, a list or set for onboard passengers, and a list for log entries. Consider using a map from stop to queue for efficient lookup.
For each stop, iterate through onboard passengers and remove those whose destination equals the current stop, logging each drop-off. Update bus occupancy accordingly.
While bus has capacity and waiting queue is not empty, dequeue passengers and add them to onboard list, logging each boarding. Stop when capacity is reached or queue is empty.
Iterate through scheduled stops in order, applying drop-off and boarding at each. After processing, return or print the log entries in the required format.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Straightforward once you figure out what state to track: current occupancy per bus, and a set of currently-boarded passengers.
Start by clarifying the log format and event types, then design a single-pass validator that maintains a set of currently onboard passengers and a running occupancy count. For each event, update state and check invariants: occupancy must stay within [0, capacity], and each passenger must board before dropping off and board at most once.
Pro tip: Mention that you'd treat the log as a stream and validate incrementally, which is O(n) time and O(p) space (p = passengers onboard), and that you'd return all violations with line numbers rather than failing on the first one for easier debugging.
Ask about the event schema (e.g., BOARD/DROPOFF, passenger ID, timestamp) and whether capacity is fixed. Confirm edge cases like duplicate events or out-of-order timestamps.
Maintain a set of onboard passenger IDs and an integer occupancy count. Invariants: 0 <= occupancy <= capacity, a passenger can board only if not already onboard, and can drop off only if currently onboard.
Iterate through the log, updating state per event and checking invariants immediately. Record any violation with event index and details instead of stopping early.
Consider empty logs, unknown event types, and passengers still onboard at the end (which may or may not be a violation). Also validate that occupancy matches the size of the onboard set.
Return a list of violations (or a boolean plus details). State time complexity O(n) and space O(p), and mention how to extend for multiple buses or time windows.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
Basically just a sorting step before the boarding loop.
Clarify the existing boarding logic and data structures, then propose a priority queue (heap) that orders passengers by priority flag, appear_time, and passenger_id. Simulate each stop by popping eligible passengers while respecting capacity, and discuss time/space trade-offs.
Pro tip: Mention that you would encapsulate the ordering logic in a comparator to keep the code extensible and testable, and explicitly handle edge cases like priority passengers arriving after regular ones or capacity being reached mid-stop.
Confirm the definition of priority (e.g., boolean flag), tie-breaking rules, and that capacity is per stop. Ask about expected input size to guide data structure choice.
Define a comparator that sorts by priority (descending), then appear_time (ascending), then passenger_id (ascending). This ensures deterministic ordering.
Use a priority queue (min-heap or max-heap with custom comparator) to efficiently retrieve the next passenger. For each stop, add newly arrived passengers to the heap, then pop up to capacity.
Iterate through stops, add passengers whose appear_time <= current stop time, then board up to remaining capacity. Track boarded passengers and update capacity.
Discuss time complexity O(N log N) due to heap operations, and space O(N). Compare with alternative approaches like sorting per stop or using buckets.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.