← Bloomberg Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just splice recursively and it worked, but I fumbled explaining the time complexity.
Clarify the structure and constraints, then propose a recursive depth-first traversal that flattens each sub-list and connects it to the parent's next pointer. Discuss iterative alternatives and trade-offs, and analyze time/space complexity.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the down pointers should be set to null after flattening to avoid cycles, and mention that an iterative approach using a stack can achieve O(1) extra space if recursion depth is a concern.
Confirm the structure: each node has next and down pointers, and down leads to a sub-list. Ensure the flattening order is depth-first and that only next pointers are used in the result.
Decide between recursive and iterative solutions. Recursive is simpler but may risk stack overflow; iterative with a stack is more robust for deep lists.
For recursion: flatten the down list, then recursively flatten the next list, and connect the tail of the down list to the flattened next list. For iteration: use a stack to process nodes, pushing next before down to ensure depth-first order.
Consider empty lists, single node, and lists with only down pointers. Ensure down pointers are set to null to avoid cycles.
Time complexity is O(N) where N is total nodes. Space complexity is O(D) for recursion depth or O(D) for stack in iterative, where D is maximum nesting depth.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.