← Bloomberg Interview Insights
I knew BFS immediately but fumbled on the state representation for a bit.
Model the problem as a shortest path on a state graph where each state is (row, col, walls_removed). Use 0-1 BFS or Dijkstra to find the minimum steps to reach the bottom-right with at most k walls removed, treating open cells as weight 0 and walls as weight 1.
Pro tip: Clarify that 'steps' means the number of moves, not the number of walls removed, and mention that if k is large enough, the problem reduces to standard BFS on open cells only. Also, discuss how to handle large grids by using a deque for 0-1 BFS to achieve O(mn) time.
Confirm that 'steps' refers to the number of moves (edges) and that removing a wall counts as traversing that cell. Ask if k can be larger than the grid size or if there are constraints on m, n, and k.
Represent each state as (r, c, w) where w is the number of walls removed so far (0 ≤ w ≤ k). Transitions: moving to an open cell keeps w, moving to a wall increments w by 1.
Use 0-1 BFS with a deque: push open-cell transitions to the front and wall transitions to the back. Alternatively, use Dijkstra with a priority queue. Both find the minimum steps.
Track visited states to avoid cycles. Early exit when reaching (m-1, n-1) with any w ≤ k. For large grids, use a 2D array of size m x n storing the minimum walls removed to reach each cell, and run BFS with a deque.
Time complexity is O(mn) because each cell is processed at most once per wall count, but with the 2D array optimization it's O(mn). Space complexity is O(mn) for the visited array and deque.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.