The problem reads like a basic sorting exercise until you hit the time complexity requirement.
Use a linear-time algorithm like radix sort or the pigeonhole principle (bucket sort) to sort or approximate the sorted order, then scan for the maximum adjacent difference. Emphasize that comparison-based sorts are O(n log n) and thus disallowed, so you must leverage integer properties or distribution.
Pro tip: Mention that the pigeonhole principle guarantees the maximum gap is at least (max-min)/(n-1), which justifies using n-1 buckets and ensures the answer lies between buckets, not within them. This shows deep understanding and avoids unnecessary comparisons.
Confirm the array size, integer range, and whether duplicates are allowed. Handle edge cases like n < 2 by returning 0 or throwing an error.
Decide between radix sort (for bounded integers) or bucket sort based on the pigeonhole principle. Explain why comparison sorts are not allowed.
For bucket sort: compute min and max, create n-1 buckets, distribute elements, then scan buckets to find max gap between consecutive non-empty buckets. For radix sort: sort then scan for max adjacent difference.
State that the algorithm runs in O(n) time and O(n) space. Discuss the trade-offs and why it meets the linear-time requirement.
Walk through a small example (e.g., [3,6,9,1]) and edge cases like all equal elements or two elements to verify correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.