← Openai Interview Insights

Openai·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
May 2026

Summary

Interviewed for an ML Engineer role at OpenAI and got a coding question that was basically 'build a key-value store from scratch.' Felt like a systems fundamentals check more than anything ML-specific, which I wasn't fully expecting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design and implement an in-memory key-value store supporting insert, get, and delete, with average O(1) time complexity for each operation. Explain your data structure choices and the time and space complexity of your approach.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Pretty much a hash map question at its core, but they wanted me to actually talk through why, not just write the code.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying requirements (e.g., thread-safety, persistence, key/value types) and then propose a hash table as the core data structure. Explain how it achieves average O(1) for insert, get, and delete, and discuss collision handling (e.g., chaining or open addressing). Finally, analyze time and space complexity, and mention potential optimizations or trade-offs.

Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of real-world constraints by discussing how you would handle collisions, resizing, and concurrency, and relate it to ML systems where fast key-value lookups are critical (e.g., feature stores, embedding caches).

1. Clarify Requirements

Ask about expected key/value types, thread-safety, persistence, and performance guarantees. This shows you consider the context before diving into design.

2. Choose Data Structure

Propose a hash table with separate chaining or open addressing. Explain why it provides average O(1) for insert, get, and delete.

3. Detail Operations

Describe how insert, get, and delete work, including collision resolution and resizing (rehashing) when load factor exceeds a threshold.

4. Analyze Complexity

State that average time complexity is O(1) per operation, worst-case O(n) due to collisions, and space complexity is O(n). Mention that resizing keeps operations amortized O(1).

5. Discuss Trade-offs and Optimizations

Mention alternatives like balanced BSTs (O(log n) worst-case) and trade-offs. Discuss concurrency (e.g., locks, lock-free) and memory overhead.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash table with separate chaining or open addressing for collision resolution
  • Average O(1) time complexity for insert, get, delete; worst-case O(n) with poor hash function
  • Space complexity O(n) for storing n key-value pairs
  • Load factor and resizing (rehashing) to maintain performance
  • Thread-safety considerations (e.g., locks, concurrent hash maps) if required
  • Comparison with other data structures (e.g., balanced BSTs) and trade-offs

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.