I went in thinking I'd nail this because I use Maps every day.
Start by framing your critique around user needs and Google's business goals, then systematically evaluate key aspects of Google Maps (e.g., accuracy, usability, performance, features). For each aspect, highlight strengths and weaknesses, and propose improvements that are technically feasible and aligned with Google's strategy.
Pro tip: Show empathy for both end-users and internal stakeholders (e.g., engineers, product managers) by acknowledging trade-offs like data freshness vs. privacy, and suggest improvements that leverage Google's strengths (e.g., AI, vast data) while being mindful of constraints.
Define the dimensions you'll use to critique Google Maps, such as accuracy, usability, performance, features, and business impact. This shows structured thinking.
Acknowledge Google Maps' strengths, like comprehensive data, real-time traffic, and seamless integration with other Google services. Be specific about why these are valuable.
Point out weaknesses or pain points, such as occasional inaccuracies, privacy concerns, or feature bloat. Prioritize issues that affect core user journeys.
Suggest concrete, actionable improvements for the weaknesses identified. Explain how they would benefit users and Google, and consider technical feasibility.
Summarize your top recommendations, explaining which improvements would have the highest impact and why. Tie back to Google's mission and business objectives.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.