← Uber Interview Insights

Uber·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
May 2026

Summary

Uber SWE coding round, pretty standard algorithmic problem but the follow-up questions are where things got interesting. Worth knowing your complexity analysis cold before going in.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Given an array of strings, group all anagrams together and return the groups.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

The core problem wasn't hard.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use a hash map to group strings by a canonical key, such as the sorted string or a character count signature. Iterate through the array, compute the key for each string, and append it to the corresponding group. Finally, return the groups as a list of lists.

Pro tip: Discuss the trade-offs between sorting each string (O(n * k log k)) and using a character count key (O(n * k)), where k is the max string length. Mention that the count-based approach can be more efficient for long strings and shows deeper optimization thinking.

1. Clarify and Confirm

Ask clarifying questions: Are all strings lowercase? Can there be empty strings? Should the output order be specific? Confirm the definition of an anagram.

2. Choose a Canonical Key

Decide on a method to represent each string uniquely: sorted string or character frequency count. Explain why this key ensures anagrams map to the same group.

3. Design the Algorithm

Outline the steps: initialize a hash map, iterate through the array, compute the key for each string, and append the string to the list associated with that key.

4. Analyze Complexity

State the time and space complexity. For sorting approach: O(n * k log k) time, O(n * k) space. For counting approach: O(n * k) time, O(n * k) space.

5. Implement and Test

Write clean code, handle edge cases (empty array, empty strings), and walk through a small example to verify correctness.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map usage for grouping
  • Canonical key: sorted string vs. character count
  • Time and space complexity analysis
  • Edge cases: empty input, empty strings, single string
  • Trade-offs between different key generation methods
  • Potential follow-up: how to handle Unicode or case sensitivity

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

What is the time and space complexity of your approach, and how do you justify it?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Blanked for a second on whether to factor in the string length or just the number of strings.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

State the time and space complexity clearly using Big-O notation, then justify each by walking through the algorithm step by step, referencing the dominant operations and data structures used. Finally, discuss any trade-offs and how the complexity might change with different inputs or constraints.

Pro tip: Always relate the complexity to the problem constraints (e.g., input size limits) and mention if the complexity is acceptable for the given scenario, showing you consider practical implications. For Uber, emphasize scalability and efficiency for large-scale systems.

1. State the complexities

Clearly state the time and space complexity in Big-O notation, e.g., O(n log n) time and O(n) space.

2. Justify time complexity

Break down the algorithm into steps, identify the most expensive operations (e.g., loops, recursive calls, sorting), and explain how they contribute to the overall time complexity.

3. Justify space complexity

Identify additional data structures used (e.g., arrays, hash maps, recursion stack) and explain how their sizes scale with input size to derive space complexity.

4. Discuss trade-offs

Mention any trade-offs between time and space, and how alternative approaches might change the complexities.

5. Relate to constraints

Connect the complexity to the problem's constraints (e.g., input size limits) and explain why it is efficient or if further optimization is needed.

Key Points to Mention

  • Big-O notation and its meaning (worst-case, average-case)
  • Dominant operations and how they scale with input size
  • Data structures used and their impact on space complexity
  • Recursion depth and stack space if applicable
  • Trade-offs between time and space (e.g., using extra space to reduce time)
  • Practical implications for large-scale systems (e.g., Uber's scale)

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

How would you adapt this solution if the input was too large to fit in memory, such as billions of strings being streamed from disk? What becomes the bottleneck when strings are very long?

System DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is the part I wasn't ready for.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by acknowledging the memory constraint and propose a streaming or external-memory algorithm that processes data in chunks, such as external sorting or a hash-based partition. Then, discuss how the bottleneck shifts from memory to I/O and CPU when strings are very long, and suggest optimizations like compression, sampling, or approximate algorithms.

Pro tip: Mention that you would first clarify the exact problem (e.g., deduplication, frequency count) and the available resources (memory, disk, time) before proposing a solution, as the optimal approach depends heavily on these constraints.

1. Clarify the problem and constraints

Ask about the specific operation (e.g., deduplication, counting, sorting), the size of data, available memory, disk space, and time limits. This ensures your solution is tailored to the actual requirements.

2. Propose a streaming or external-memory approach

Suggest processing data in chunks using external sorting (e.g., merge sort with disk-based runs) or hash-based partitioning to group similar strings, reducing memory usage.

3. Identify the bottleneck for long strings

Explain that with very long strings, I/O becomes the primary bottleneck due to reading/writing large amounts of data, and CPU may also be strained by string operations like hashing or comparison.

4. Optimize for long strings

Propose techniques like compression, using hashes or fingerprints instead of full strings, or sampling to reduce data volume. Discuss trade-offs between accuracy and resource usage.

5. Consider distributed or approximate solutions

If applicable, mention scaling out to multiple machines (e.g., MapReduce) or using approximate algorithms like Bloom filters or HyperLogLog for counting distinct elements.

Key Points to Mention

  • External sorting and merge sort with disk-based runs
  • Hash-based partitioning to process data in chunks
  • I/O bottleneck when strings are long; CPU bottleneck for string operations
  • Compression or using hashes/fingerprints to reduce data size
  • Approximate algorithms (Bloom filter, HyperLogLog) for memory efficiency
  • Distributed processing (MapReduce, Spark) for scalability

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.