The definition part is what actually took time.
Start by clarifying the definition of 'recurring' with the interviewer, then propose a solution that groups transactions by merchant and currency, detects patterns based on consistent intervals and amounts, and outputs a summary. Discuss trade-offs between simple heuristics and more robust statistical methods, and consider scalability for large datasets.
Pro tip: Demonstrate product thinking by discussing how false positives (e.g., two coffee purchases) could annoy users, and propose a confidence score or user feedback loop to refine detection.
Ask clarifying questions about data volume, expected recurrence types, and tolerance for false positives/negatives. Propose a working definition: a series of transactions from the same merchant and currency with similar amounts occurring at regular intervals (e.g., within a tolerance window).
Group transactions by a composite key of merchant and currency. For each group, sort transactions by date and analyze intervals between consecutive transactions to identify potential recurrence patterns.
For each group, compute the differences between consecutive transaction dates and amounts. Use clustering or threshold-based matching to identify consistent intervals (daily, weekly, monthly) and amounts (within a percentage tolerance). Consider minimum number of occurrences to confirm recurrence.
Account for irregular intervals due to weekends/holidays (e.g., monthly subscriptions may shift by a few days). Allow detection of multiple recurrence periods per merchant-currency pair if applicable (e.g., a merchant with both weekly and monthly charges).
Format the output as required (e.g., 'Netflix, $30.00 per month'). Discuss trade-offs: simplicity vs. accuracy, computational complexity (O(n log n) due to sorting), and potential scalability improvements (e.g., streaming or windowed processing).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.