← Capital One Interview Insights
This one tripped me up because I kept second-guessing whether the $20 cap was binding or not.
First, clarify the WTP curve from the prior question (likely a linear or concave function relating number of shows to maximum willingness-to-pay). Then set up the optimization: maximize revenue (or profit) subject to budget and price cap, solving for the optimal number of shows and corresponding price. Repeat for the larger budget, noting how the optimal solution changes.
Pro tip: Always state your assumptions about the WTP curve explicitly, and show the marginal analysis: the optimal number of shows occurs where marginal revenue equals marginal cost (or where the budget constraint binds if the price cap is not binding).
Restate the WTP curve from the prior question (e.g., P = a - bQ or a table) and note the $20 price cap and budget constraints. Confirm units and that each show costs $5M.
Define the decision variable Q (number of shows). The budget constraint is 5Q ≤ B (B = 150 or 250). The price is P = min(WTP(Q), 20). Revenue is P * Q (or profit if costs are considered).
Maximize revenue subject to 5Q ≤ 150 and P ≤ 20. Check if the unconstrained optimal Q (where marginal revenue = 0) is feasible; if not, the budget binds. Compute P from the WTP curve and apply the cap if needed.
Redo the optimization with B = 250. Compare the new optimal Q and P to the previous case, noting the effect of the larger budget.
Ensure Q is an integer (if shows are discrete), P is within the cap, and the budget is not exceeded. Discuss how the price cap may or may not bind depending on Q.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.