I started with the GMV piece because that felt safest, then tried to bolt on the rest.
Start by clarifying requirements and assumptions, then outline a modular query structure using CTEs for deduplication, timezone normalization, and metric calculations. Explain how you handle late-arriving events with a watermark and how window functions address each metric, emphasizing correctness and performance trade-offs.
Pro tip: Mention that you would validate the query against a small manually computed dataset and discuss how you'd monitor data quality (e.g., late event rates) in production. This shows you think beyond just writing SQL.
Ask about definitions: what counts as a new user, how conversion is attributed, what '7-day rolling retention' means (e.g., active on day 7 after signup), and how to handle multiple campaigns. Confirm timezone (e.g., UTC) and late event tolerance.
Use a CTE with ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY uid, ts, event_type ORDER BY ingestion_time DESC) to deduplicate, keeping the latest record. Convert all timestamps to a consistent timezone (e.g., UTC) using AT TIME ZONE.
Define a watermark (e.g., allow events up to 7 days late) and filter or aggregate accordingly. Use event_time for windowing and ingestion_time for deduplication. Mention that late events may require reprocessing or incremental updates.
For each metric, choose appropriate window functions: e.g., COUNT(DISTINCT uid) for new users, SUM(CASE WHEN ...) for conversions, and window frames for rolling retention. Use PARTITION BY month, country and ORDER BY event_time for rolling calculations.
Combine CTEs into a single query, ensuring correct grouping and ordering. Explain why you chose specific window functions (e.g., ROWS BETWEEN for rolling retention) and discuss performance considerations like indexing and partition pruning.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.