← Atlassian Interview Insights

Atlassian·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

Senior
Jun 2026

Summary

Atlassian ML Engineer interview had a classic data structures problem that looks deceptively clean on the surface but punishes you if you haven't thought through the bucket approach before.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design a data structure that supports increment, decrement, get-max-key, and get-min-key operations, all in O(1) average time.

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

I knew a hashmap alone wouldn't cut it the moment they said O(1) for both max and min.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the operations and constraints, then propose a hybrid data structure combining a hash map for O(1) key access and a doubly linked list of frequency buckets to maintain order. Explain how increment and decrement adjust the key's position between buckets, and how get-max-key and get-min-key retrieve from the ends of the list.

Pro tip: Mention that this is essentially an LFU cache design, and highlight that the O(1) average time relies on hash map operations and constant-time list manipulations. Also, discuss edge cases like when multiple keys share the same frequency and how to handle them.

1. Clarify Requirements and Constraints

Ask if keys are integers or strings, if frequencies can be negative, and if we need to handle concurrent access. Confirm that all operations must be O(1) average time.

2. Propose Core Data Structures

Use a hash map to store key -> node, where each node contains the key and its frequency. Use a doubly linked list of buckets, each bucket representing a frequency and containing a set of keys with that frequency.

3. Detail Operations

For increment: move key to the next higher frequency bucket, creating it if necessary. For decrement: move to the next lower bucket, removing empty buckets. For get-max-key and get-min-key: return any key from the highest or lowest frequency bucket respectively.

4. Analyze Complexity and Edge Cases

Explain that each operation involves O(1) hash map lookups and O(1) pointer updates in the linked list. Discuss edge cases: multiple keys with same frequency, decrementing to zero, and empty structure.

5. Discuss Extensions and Trade-offs

Mention how to adapt for ML engineering (e.g., tracking feature frequencies) and trade-offs like memory overhead vs. speed. Optionally, compare with alternative approaches like balanced BSTs (O(log n)).

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map for O(1) key lookup and frequency tracking.
  • Doubly linked list of frequency buckets to maintain order.
  • Increment/decrement move keys between adjacent buckets in O(1).
  • Get-max-key and get-min-key access the head/tail of the bucket list.
  • Handling multiple keys with the same frequency using a set or linked list within each bucket.
  • Edge cases: empty structure, decrementing below zero, and bucket cleanup.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.