← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
May 2026Remote

Summary

Meta coding screen for a software engineer role, focused on array problems that started simple and got progressively more interesting. The tradeoff discussion at the end was where things got real.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Given an unsorted array of integers, write a function to return the minimum value.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Warmup question, single linear scan, nothing to it.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., array size, data types, whether the array can be empty) and then propose a simple linear scan solution. Discuss the time and space complexity, and consider edge cases such as empty arrays or arrays with a single element. If appropriate, mention alternative approaches like sorting or using built-in functions, but emphasize that linear scan is optimal for unsorted arrays.

Pro tip: Demonstrate awareness of production code by discussing how to handle edge cases gracefully (e.g., returning null or throwing an exception for empty arrays) and mentioning that in real-world scenarios, you might use a library function but understanding the underlying algorithm is crucial.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about array size, data types, whether the array can be empty, and if there are any memory or time constraints. This shows you think before coding.

2. Propose a linear scan approach

Explain that you will iterate through the array once, keeping track of the minimum value seen so far. Initialize the minimum with the first element or infinity, depending on handling of empty arrays.

3. Analyze complexity

State that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(1), which is optimal for an unsorted array since you must examine each element at least once.

4. Handle edge cases

Discuss how to handle empty arrays (e.g., return null, throw an exception, or return a sentinel value) and arrays with one element. Also consider negative numbers and duplicates.

5. Write and test the code

Implement the function in your preferred language, then walk through a few test cases (e.g., empty array, single element, all negative, mixed) to verify correctness.

Key Points to Mention

  • Time complexity: O(n) because each element must be examined at least once.
  • Space complexity: O(1) as only a single variable is needed to track the minimum.
  • Edge cases: empty array, single-element array, arrays with all negative numbers, and arrays with duplicates.
  • Alternative approaches: sorting (O(n log n)) or using built-in functions (e.g., Math.min in JavaScript), but linear scan is optimal.
  • Language-specific considerations: how to initialize the minimum (e.g., using Infinity or the first element) and how to handle empty arrays.
  • Code clarity: use meaningful variable names, add comments, and consider writing a helper function if needed.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

For an unsorted array of integers, write a function to return the mode (most frequently occurring value). Walk through a sorting-based approach versus a hash-map counting approach, and if the value range is small and known, a counting array approach. Discuss the tradeoffs in time and space across all three.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This is where the interview actually happened.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying constraints (array size, value range, memory limits) and then compare the three approaches: sorting (O(n log n) time, O(1) extra space), hash map (O(n) time, O(n) space), and counting array (O(n + k) time, O(k) space). For each, explain how to compute the mode, discuss tradeoffs, and recommend the best choice based on the scenario.

Pro tip: Mention that the hash map approach is generally preferred for unsorted arrays with arbitrary values, but if the value range is small and known, the counting array is optimal. Also, note that sorting modifies the input, which may be undesirable.

1. Clarify constraints and assumptions

Ask about array size, value range, whether the array can be modified, and memory limitations. This determines which approach is most suitable.

2. Sorting-based approach

Sort the array, then scan to find the longest run of equal elements. Time: O(n log n), Space: O(1) extra (or O(n) if sorting cannot be in-place).

3. Hash-map counting approach

Iterate through the array, count frequencies in a hash map, then find the key with the maximum count. Time: O(n), Space: O(n).

4. Counting array approach (if value range small and known)

Create an array of size equal to the range, count occurrences, then find the index with the maximum count. Time: O(n + k), Space: O(k), where k is the range size.

5. Compare tradeoffs and recommend

Discuss when each approach is best: sorting for low memory, hash map for general case, counting array for small known range. Mention edge cases like ties or empty array.

Key Points to Mention

  • Time and space complexity of each approach: sorting O(n log n) time O(1) space; hash map O(n) time O(n) space; counting array O(n + k) time O(k) space.
  • Hash map is generally the most efficient for unsorted arrays with arbitrary values, but uses extra space.
  • Sorting modifies the input array, which may not be allowed; also, it's slower than hash map for large n.
  • Counting array is optimal when the value range is small and known, but can be memory-inefficient if the range is large.
  • Edge cases: empty array, multiple modes (tie), negative numbers, and large value ranges.
  • In practice, consider using a hash map with a single pass to track both frequency and current maximum to avoid a second pass.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

How does your approach to finding the mode change under streaming input, or when you're operating under strict memory constraints?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offsSystem Design
Author's notes

Didn't see this follow-up coming.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by contrasting the classic in-memory mode algorithm (e.g., Boyer-Moore majority vote for a single element or hash map for exact mode) with the streaming/memory-constrained setting. Then present a spectrum of solutions: exact algorithms with trade-offs (e.g., Misra-Gries, Count-Min Sketch) and approximate algorithms (e.g., reservoir sampling, space-saving), highlighting the balance between accuracy, memory, and update time. Finally, discuss how to choose based on requirements like exactness, frequency of queries, and data characteristics.

Pro tip: Mention that for strict memory constraints, you might need to accept approximation and discuss error bounds (e.g., Misra-Gries guarantees no overestimation and bounded underestimation). Also, note that if the stream is skewed, a simple heavy-hitters algorithm often suffices, but for uniform distributions, you may need more sophisticated sketches.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about the definition of 'mode' (single element, all elements with max frequency, top-k), memory limits, whether exactness is required, and the nature of the stream (insertions only, deletions, sliding window).

2. Discuss exact algorithms and their limitations

Explain that exact mode in one pass with limited memory is impossible for arbitrary data (requires Ω(n) space). Mention that if memory is sufficient, a hash map works, but for strict constraints, exactness may be sacrificed.

3. Present approximate streaming algorithms

Describe algorithms like Misra-Gries (frequent items), Count-Min Sketch (frequency estimation), or Space-Saving (top-k). Explain their memory-accuracy trade-offs and error guarantees.

4. Address trade-offs and practical considerations

Compare update time, query time, memory usage, and accuracy. Discuss how to handle deletions (e.g., using sketches with counters) and sliding windows (e.g., exponential histograms).

5. Conclude with a recommendation

Based on the clarified requirements, suggest a suitable approach, such as using Misra-Gries for heavy hitters with bounded memory, or a combination of sketches for more complex scenarios.

Key Points to Mention

  • Boyer-Moore majority vote algorithm for finding a majority element in one pass with O(1) memory, but it only works if a majority exists.
  • Misra-Gries algorithm for finding frequent items (heavy hitters) with error guarantees and O(1/ε) memory.
  • Count-Min Sketch for frequency estimation with sublinear space, allowing approximate mode queries.
  • Space-Saving algorithm for top-k frequent items with efficient memory usage.
  • Trade-offs between exactness, memory, and update/query time; impossibility of exact mode in one pass with limited memory.
  • Handling data streams with deletions or sliding windows using advanced sketches like Count-Min Sketch with conservative updates or exponential histograms.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.