← Flatiron Health Interview Insights
The rules seemed straightforward at first but rule 3 tripped me up a bit.
Walk through the data cleaning pipeline step by step, explaining the rationale for each rule and how you would implement it in tidyverse R. Then compute the two metrics, emphasizing the importance of rounding at the end and validating results. Finally, discuss potential pitfalls and how you would handle them.
Pro tip: Mention that you would validate the cleaning steps with sanity checks (e.g., ensuring no negative active days, checking the distribution of churned status) and that you would use `across()` or `if_else()` for efficient column-wise operations. Also, note that rounding should be applied only at the final step to avoid compounding rounding errors.
Read the CSV using `read_csv()` and examine the structure, data types, and missing values to understand the cleaning needed.
Drop rows with null ids, fill null pay with 0, infer churned status from pay (e.g., churned if pay == 0), and compute active days as last active date minus signup date with a floor at zero.
Calculate the average active days across all remaining customers and the average pay among churned customers using `summarise()`.
Round both averages to 2 decimal places using `round()` and present the final output clearly.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.
This one took me longer than I want to admit.
Break the problem into stages: first compute each student's average score and filter out those with no grades, then determine the cutoff for the top half using a window function, and finally rank and select the top students. Use CTEs to keep the logic clear and ensure the query scales correctly with data growth.
Pro tip: Explicitly handle ties and the CEIL(N/2) cutoff with window functions like ROW_NUMBER or DENSE_RANK, and mention that using a subquery to compute N avoids hardcoding and keeps the query correct as data grows.
Join Students to Grades (and Assignments if needed) and group by student to calculate AVG(score), filtering out students with no grades using an INNER JOIN or HAVING COUNT(grade) > 0.
Use a window function or subquery to count the total number of students with grades (N) and compute CEIL(N/2) to know how many top students to keep.
Apply DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY average_score DESC, student_id ASC) to assign ranks, ensuring ties are broken by student_id ascending.
Select only rows where the dense rank is less than or equal to CEIL(N/2), using a CTE or subquery to reference the computed cutoff.
Round the average score to the desired precision (e.g., ROUND(AVG(score), 2)) and output student_id, name, rounded average, and dense rank.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.