The bug-finding part ate up way more time than I expected.
Start by carefully reviewing the provided code to identify the bug, explaining the root cause and its impact. Then, implement a correct algorithm from scratch, clearly stating assumptions and handling edge cases. Finally, discuss optimizations, comparing time and space complexity trade-offs and justifying your choices.
Pro tip: When debugging, articulate your thought process aloud and consider writing a test case that exposes the bug. For optimization, mention both algorithmic improvements (e.g., using hash sets) and micro-optimizations, but prioritize clarity and correctness first.
Clarify the input format, card value ranges, and whether duplicates are allowed. Confirm the expected output (e.g., any three cards or all triplets).
Trace through the code with sample inputs, looking for off-by-one errors, incorrect loop bounds, or mishandling of duplicates. Explain why the bug causes incorrect results.
Choose a straightforward approach, such as sorting and using two pointers, or brute force for small inputs. Write clean, modular code and test with edge cases.
Analyze time and space complexity. Consider using a hash set to achieve O(n^2) time, or other optimizations like early termination. Discuss trade-offs.
Run through examples, including edge cases (e.g., no triplet, multiple triplets, negative values). Ensure the optimized solution matches the brute force results.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.