I jumped straight to a hashmap keyed on (userId, accountId) and felt pretty good about it.
Start by clarifying the expected operations and constraints (e.g., read-heavy vs. write-heavy, memory limits). Propose a hash map keyed by (userId, accountId) mapping to a set of roles, which gives O(1) lookup and automatic deduplication. Discuss trade-offs with alternative indexes like nested maps or sorted arrays, and explain how to handle duplicates by using a set or deduplicating during insertion.
Pro tip: Mention that using a set for roles not only handles duplicates but also makes role checks and updates efficient; if roles are fixed and small, a bitmask could be even faster. Also, consider whether the index should be built once or maintained incrementally, and how that affects concurrency and memory.
Ask about the expected operations (e.g., frequent lookups, updates, deletions), data size, memory limits, and whether the input is static or dynamic. This determines the appropriate index and data structures.
Suggest a hash map with a composite key (userId, accountId) mapping to a collection of roles. Explain that this provides O(1) average-time lookup and naturally groups roles per user-account pair.
Use a set to store roles to automatically deduplicate. If roles are a known small set, consider a bitmask or boolean array for memory efficiency. Discuss deduplication at insertion time vs. query time.
Compare with nested maps (userId -> accountId -> roles) which may be more memory-efficient if many users have few accounts, or sorted arrays for range queries. Mention time/space trade-offs and when each might be preferable.
Cover empty results, missing keys, concurrent updates, and memory overhead. Suggest sharding or partitioning if the dataset is large, and mention how to handle dynamic updates efficiently.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.