← Cisco Interview Insights

Cisco·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jul 2026

Summary

Cisco software engineer interview with three algorithmic problems, all fairly involved. The grid traversal one at the end was the kind of question that makes you question your life choices mid-interview.

Questions Asked (3)

Q1

Given an integer array, find the contiguous subarray with the maximum sum and return the sum along with its start and end indices. If there are ties in sum, prefer the shorter subarray, then the earliest start. Must run in O(n) time with O(1) space. Also explain how your solution handles arrays where all values are negative.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Kadane's algorithm, pretty standard.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use Kadane's algorithm to find the maximum subarray sum in O(n) time, while tracking the start and end indices. Handle ties by preferring the shorter subarray and then the earliest start. For all-negative arrays, initialize the maximum sum to the first element and update only when a larger sum is found, ensuring the least negative element is returned.

Pro tip: Explicitly discuss tie-breaking logic and all-negative cases during your explanation; this shows attention to edge cases and thoroughness, which interviewers value.

1. Clarify requirements and edge cases

Confirm that the array can contain negative numbers, zeros, and that the subarray must be non-empty. Discuss tie-breaking rules and all-negative scenarios.

2. Explain Kadane's algorithm

Describe how to iterate through the array, maintaining the maximum sum ending at the current position and the overall maximum sum. Mention updating start and end indices when a new maximum is found.

3. Detail tie-breaking and all-negative handling

Explain how to compare subarray lengths and start indices when sums are equal. For all-negative arrays, initialize with the first element and update only when a strictly greater sum is found.

4. Walk through an example

Choose a small array (e.g., [-2, 1, -3, 4, -1, 2, 1, -5, 4]) and trace the algorithm, showing how indices and sums are updated.

5. Analyze complexity and conclude

State that the algorithm runs in O(n) time and O(1) space, and summarize how it meets all requirements.

Key Points to Mention

  • Kadane's algorithm and its O(n) time, O(1) space complexity.
  • Tracking start and end indices of the maximum subarray.
  • Tie-breaking: prefer shorter subarray, then earliest start.
  • Handling all-negative arrays by initializing with the first element.
  • Edge cases: empty array (if allowed), single element, zeros.
  • Comparison with brute-force O(n^2) approach to highlight efficiency.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Given an array of integers, return the smallest value that appears exactly once. Return the minimum among all such values, or -1 if none exist. Aim for O(n) time. Follow-up: how does your approach change under tight memory constraints or when the integer range is bounded?

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

Used a frequency map, grabbed the min from values with count 1.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use a hash map to count frequencies of each element, then iterate through the map to find the smallest value with count 1. This gives O(n) time and O(n) space. For the follow-up, discuss trade-offs: if memory is tight, sort the array (O(n log n)) and scan for unique elements; if the integer range is bounded, use a frequency array of size equal to the range.

Pro tip: Always clarify constraints (e.g., input size, integer range, memory limits) before coding, as they determine the optimal approach. Mention that the hash map solution is simple but may not be memory-efficient for large inputs.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about input size, integer range, memory limits, and whether the array can be modified. This guides the choice of algorithm.

2. Propose hash map solution

Explain that you would use a hash map to count frequencies, then find the minimum key with count 1. This achieves O(n) time and O(n) space.

3. Address follow-up: memory constraints

If memory is tight, suggest sorting the array and scanning for unique elements (O(n log n) time, O(1) extra space if in-place). Alternatively, use a two-pass approach with bit manipulation if applicable.

4. Address follow-up: bounded integer range

If the range is small, use a frequency array of size equal to the range, which is O(n) time and O(range) space. This is more memory-efficient than a hash map if range is small.

5. Analyze trade-offs and conclude

Summarize the trade-offs between time and space for each approach, and recommend the best based on typical constraints. Mention edge cases like empty array or all duplicates.

Key Points to Mention

  • Hash map frequency counting for O(n) time
  • Sorting approach for O(n log n) time and O(1) extra space
  • Frequency array for bounded integer range
  • Trade-offs between time and space complexity
  • Edge cases: empty array, all elements repeated, negative numbers
  • Importance of clarifying constraints before choosing an approach

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

On an m by n grid starting at the top-left cell, you move counterclockwise cycling through right, up, left, down. Each move skips one cell and lands two cells away in the current direction. The skipped cell stays unvisited. If the landing cell is out of bounds or already visited, rotate 90 degrees counterclockwise and try again. Stop when all four directions are blocked. Return the last visited cell's coordinates, and analyze the time and space complexity of your solution.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

This one was rough.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

First, clarify the movement rules and edge cases, then simulate the process using a visited matrix and direction array. After confirming correctness, analyze time and space complexity, noting that each cell is visited at most once.

Pro tip: Mention that the 'skip one cell' rule means you only land on cells of the same parity as the start, so half the grid is never visited—this can optimize the visited matrix or reduce simulation steps.

1. Clarify the problem

Restate the movement rules: start at (0,0), move counterclockwise cycling right, up, left, down; each move skips one cell and lands two cells away; if landing is out of bounds or visited, rotate 90° counterclockwise and try again; stop when all four directions are blocked. Confirm the grid dimensions and coordinate system.

2. Design the simulation

Use a 2D boolean array to track visited cells. Maintain current position (r, c) and current direction index (0=right, 1=up, 2=left, 3=down). At each step, attempt to move two cells in the current direction; if invalid, rotate direction and retry. Stop when all four directions are blocked.

3. Implement and test

Write code to simulate the process, marking cells as visited. Test with small grids (e.g., 1x1, 2x2, 3x3) to verify the stopping condition and last visited cell. Consider edge cases like starting cell and immediate blocking.

4. Analyze complexity

Time: Each cell is visited at most once, and for each visit we check up to 4 directions, so O(m*n) time. Space: O(m*n) for the visited matrix, which can be optimized to O(m*n/2) due to parity, but still O(m*n).

Key Points to Mention

  • Use a visited matrix to avoid revisiting cells.
  • Direction cycling order: right, up, left, down (counterclockwise).
  • Movement skips one cell, so landing is two cells away; intermediate cell remains unvisited.
  • Stopping condition: when all four directions are blocked (out of bounds or visited).
  • Time complexity O(m*n) because each cell is visited at most once.
  • Space complexity O(m*n) for visited matrix, but can be optimized by noting only half the cells are reachable due to parity.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.