← Databricks Interview Insights
The falling simulation part I handled okay.
Clarify the block's shape and the environment representation, then model the falling process by computing the maximum drop height for each column the block occupies, considering obstacles. Simulate the fall step-by-step or compute the final position directly, and for the follow-up, update the environment by adding the block's cells to the grid and printing it.
Pro tip: Discuss trade-offs between step-by-step simulation and direct computation, and mention how you would handle edge cases like obstacles blocking the path or the block landing on uneven surfaces. This shows you think about efficiency and robustness.
Ask about the block's shape (e.g., single cell, L-shape, etc.), the environment representation (array of column heights vs. 2D grid), and how obstacles are specified. Confirm the output format for the follow-up.
Represent the block as a set of relative coordinates and the environment as a height map or grid. Determine the block's initial horizontal position based on the offset.
For each column the block occupies, find the highest obstacle or ground below the block's starting height. The block's drop distance is the minimum over these columns of (starting height - obstacle height - block height in that column).
After the block lands, update the environment by adding the block's cells to the grid or increasing the column heights accordingly. Print the updated environment as specified.
Discuss time and space complexity, and consider edge cases such as obstacles directly under the block, uneven terrain, or the block partially overlapping obstacles.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.