I jumped straight to quickselect without much preamble, which I think was the right call.
Start by clarifying constraints and edge cases, then present two approaches: sorting and Quickselect. Emphasize Quickselect's average O(n) time and O(1) space, walk through the partition logic, and provide clean code. Conclude with complexity analysis and discuss trade-offs like worst-case O(n^2) and the heap alternative.
Pro tip: Mention that you can use a min-heap of size k for O(n log k) time, which is better for streaming data or when k is small, showing you consider practical scenarios beyond the optimal average-case solution.
Ask about input size, duplicates, memory constraints, and whether the array can be modified. Confirm that k is 1-indexed and within bounds.
Mention sorting (O(n log n)), min-heap of size k (O(n log k)), and Quickselect (average O(n)). Explain why Quickselect is optimal for average-case time and space.
Describe partitioning around a pivot and recursively searching only the side containing the k-th largest. Use a random pivot to avoid worst-case on sorted input.
Implement the partition function and the recursive or iterative Quickselect. Walk through a small example to verify correctness, including duplicates.
State average O(n) time and O(1) space (ignoring recursion stack). Discuss worst-case O(n^2) and how randomization mitigates it. Compare with heap approach for streaming or when k is small.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.