← Confluent Interview Insights
I jumped straight to the fully-completed case and started coding row/column checks before they clarified it could be partial.
Clarify that 'valid' means no duplicate digits in any row, column, or 3x3 sub-box, ignoring empty cells. Then propose a single-pass solution using hash sets (or boolean arrays) to track seen digits for each row, column, and box, checking for duplicates as you iterate over the board. Discuss time and space complexity, and mention possible optimizations like bitmasking.
Pro tip: Mention that you can validate the board in one pass by mapping each cell to its corresponding 3x3 box index (row/3)*3 + col/3, and using a set per box. This shows you understand how to avoid redundant scans and handle the problem efficiently.
Confirm that 'valid' means no duplicate numbers in any row, column, or 3x3 sub-box, and that empty cells (often represented by '.' or 0) are ignored. Ask about input format and whether the board is guaranteed to be 9x9.
Decide to use hash sets or boolean arrays for each row, column, and box to track seen digits. Explain that this allows O(1) duplicate checks.
Loop over each cell; if it's not empty, compute its box index and check if the digit already exists in the corresponding row, column, or box set. If it does, return false immediately.
If no duplicate is found, add the digit to the row, column, and box sets to mark it as seen.
After processing all cells, return true, indicating the board is valid. Discuss time complexity O(1) since board size is fixed (81 cells), and space O(1) as well.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.