I knew sorting was the right first move since grouping similar lengths reduces padding, but formalizing the DP recurrence took me longer than I'd like to admit.
First clarify the problem and edge cases, then propose a dynamic programming solution that sorts the lengths and computes the minimum waste for partitioning the first i documents into j batches. Explain the recurrence and how to reconstruct the partition, and discuss time/space complexity and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Mention that sorting is valid because in an optimal solution each batch consists of a contiguous segment of sorted lengths, which simplifies the DP and reduces the state space. Also, proactively discuss how to handle large K or G with optimizations like divide-and-conquer DP or convex hull trick.
Confirm definitions and constraints, and explicitly handle K=0 (return 0 waste and empty partition) and G>=K (each document in its own batch, waste=0).
Sort the lengths ascending. Argue that an optimal partition can be formed by contiguous segments in sorted order, because swapping elements to make batches contiguous does not increase waste.
Let dp[i][j] be the minimum waste for partitioning the first i documents into j batches. Recurrence: dp[i][j] = min_{p<j..i-1} dp[p][j-1] + waste(p+1..i), where waste(l..r) = (r-l+1)*len[r] - sum_{t=l}^r len[t].
Fill the DP table bottom-up, keeping parent pointers to reconstruct one optimal partition. Return dp[K][min(G,K)] and the batches.
State O(K^2 * G) time and O(K*G) space; mention that prefix sums allow O(1) waste computation, and discuss possible optimizations like divide-and-conquer DP or convex hull trick if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.