← Verkada Inc. Interview Insights

Verkada Inc.·Frontend Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jul 2026

Summary

Verkada frontend round with two algorithm problems, both pretty standard if you've done any leetcode prep. Nothing tricky or surprising, just classic problems with clean solutions.

Questions Asked (2)

Q1

Given an integer array, find the contiguous subarray with the largest sum and return that sum.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Kadane's algorithm, pretty much textbook.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints and edge cases, then explain the optimal O(n) Kadane's algorithm. Walk through a small example to demonstrate understanding, and finally discuss potential optimizations or variations.

Pro tip: Mention that Kadane's algorithm can be adapted to return the subarray itself, and highlight its linear time complexity as optimal for this problem. Also, briefly note how you would handle all-negative arrays.

1. Clarify requirements and edge cases

Ask about input size, possible values (negative, zero, positive), and whether the subarray must be non-empty. Confirm the expected return type.

2. Explain the brute-force approach

Briefly mention the O(n^2) or O(n^3) solution to show you understand the problem, then transition to the optimal approach.

3. Present Kadane's algorithm

Describe the dynamic programming approach: maintain current sum and max sum, resetting current sum to 0 when it becomes negative. Emphasize O(n) time and O(1) space.

4. Walk through an example

Use a small array (e.g., [-2,1,-3,4,-1,2,1,-5,4]) to illustrate how the algorithm works step by step, showing updates to current and max sums.

5. Discuss variations and optimizations

Mention how to return the subarray indices, handle all-negative arrays, and note that this is optimal for the problem.

Key Points to Mention

  • Kadane's algorithm and its O(n) time complexity
  • Handling edge cases: empty array, all negative numbers, single element
  • Space complexity O(1) and why it's optimal
  • The dynamic programming insight: max subarray ending at each index
  • Potential follow-up: return the subarray itself, not just the sum
  • Comparison with brute-force approaches to highlight efficiency

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Given a set of coin denominations and a target amount, return the minimum number of coins needed to reach that amount, or -1 if it's not possible.

Algorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

Classic bottom-up DP.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the problem constraints (e.g., unlimited coin supply, positive denominations, target >= 0). Then explain that this is a classic dynamic programming problem where you build up the minimum coins for each amount from 0 to target, using the recurrence dp[i] = min(dp[i - coin] + 1) for each coin. Finally, discuss time/space complexity and possible optimizations or edge cases.

Pro tip: Mention that while greedy works for some coin systems (like US coins), it fails for arbitrary denominations, so DP is the safe general solution. Also, note that you can optimize space to O(target) and that BFS can be an alternative if you think of it as a shortest-path problem.

1. Clarify constraints and edge cases

Ask about coin denominations (positive integers?), target amount (non-negative?), and whether coins can be reused unlimited times. Discuss edge cases like target = 0 (return 0) or impossible amounts (return -1).

2. Define the DP state and recurrence

Let dp[i] be the minimum coins to make amount i. Initialize dp[0] = 0 and dp[i] = infinity for i > 0. For each amount i from 1 to target, and for each coin c <= i, update dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[i - c] + 1).

3. Implement and handle impossible cases

After filling the DP table, if dp[target] is still infinity, return -1; otherwise return dp[target]. Mention that you can use a large number like target+1 as infinity to avoid overflow.

4. Analyze complexity and potential optimizations

Time complexity is O(target * number of coins), space is O(target). You can reduce space to O(target) (already minimal) and note that BFS can solve it in O(target * coins) as well but may be more intuitive for shortest path.

5. Test with examples and discuss trade-offs

Walk through a small example (e.g., coins = [1,2,5], target = 11) to verify. Compare with greedy approach and explain why greedy fails for some denominations (e.g., coins = [1,3,4], target = 6).

Key Points to Mention

  • Dynamic programming approach with bottom-up tabulation
  • Recurrence relation: dp[i] = min(dp[i - coin] + 1) for all coins <= i
  • Initialization: dp[0] = 0, others = infinity (or target+1)
  • Return -1 if dp[target] remains infinity
  • Time complexity O(target * number of coins), space O(target)
  • Greedy algorithm is not always optimal; DP guarantees correctness

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.