I went with a hash map immediately, which I think was fine, but then they pushed me on whether I'd considered ordered access patterns and I kind of fumbled.
Start by clarifying requirements (e.g., thread safety, persistence, expected operations) and then propose a hash table as the core data structure. Implement the operations with careful handling of edge cases, and analyze time/space complexity. Discuss trade-offs and potential improvements.
Pro tip: Mention that in real-world systems, thread safety and memory management are critical; briefly discuss how you would handle concurrency (e.g., using locks or concurrent data structures) and eviction policies like LRU if the store grows unbounded.
Ask about expected operations, data types, thread safety, persistence, and performance constraints to tailor your design.
Select a hash table for O(1) average-case operations, and justify why it's better than alternatives like arrays or trees for this use case.
Write pseudocode or explain how each operation (put, get, update, delete, exists) works, including handling of duplicate keys and missing keys.
Discuss time and space complexity for each operation, noting average vs. worst-case scenarios and potential collisions.
Cover edge cases like null keys/values, duplicate keys, missing keys, and discuss trade-offs (e.g., memory overhead, resizing, concurrency).
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.