← Openai Interview Insights

Openai·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPrefer not to say
Jun 2026Remote

Summary

OpenAI SWE interview where they dropped a broken Transformer implementation on me and said find four bugs. No hints, no warm-up, just here's the code, good luck.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

You are given a Transformer implementation with exactly four bugs. Identify and fix all of them, explaining each fix. Bugs may include shape or dimension errors, masking errors, missing scaling factors, softmax applied along the wrong axis, parameter initialization issues, or subtle variable name typos.

Technical Trade-offsAlgorithms & Data StructuresSystem Design
Author's notes

This wrecked me a little.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by outlining the standard Transformer architecture and the typical bug categories mentioned. Then systematically trace through the code, checking each component (attention, feed-forward, etc.) for shape mismatches, masking errors, scaling issues, softmax axis, initialization, and typos. For each bug, explain the fix and why it matters.

Pro tip: Demonstrate a methodical debugging process: use print statements or shape assertions to verify tensor dimensions at each step, and explain how each bug would affect training or inference. This shows you can not only find bugs but also understand their impact.

1. Understand the expected architecture

Recall the standard Transformer components: multi-head attention, positional encoding, layer normalization, feed-forward networks, and residual connections. Know the expected tensor shapes and operations.

2. Check attention mechanism

Verify scaling of QK^T by sqrt(d_k), correct softmax axis (last dimension), and proper masking (e.g., causal mask for decoder). Ensure shapes align for matrix multiplications.

3. Inspect feed-forward and normalization

Check dimensions in feed-forward layers (expansion and contraction), and verify layer normalization is applied correctly (e.g., over the last dimension). Look for missing residual connections.

4. Review parameter initialization and typos

Ensure weights are initialized appropriately (e.g., Xavier/Glorot). Scan for variable name typos that could cause incorrect tensor usage or silent errors.

5. Validate with a forward pass

Mentally or actually run a small input through the model, checking shapes and outputs at each step. Confirm that fixes resolve the issues without introducing new ones.

Key Points to Mention

  • Scaling factor 1/sqrt(d_k) in attention scores
  • Softmax applied along the correct axis (last dimension)
  • Proper masking (e.g., causal mask) to prevent attending to future tokens
  • Shape consistency in multi-head attention (splitting and concatenating heads)
  • Correct initialization (e.g., Xavier) to avoid vanishing/exploding gradients
  • Variable name typos that lead to using wrong tensors

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.