The scope of this caught me a bit flat-footed.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then outline a modular pipeline: input validation, LLM prompt with schema context, formula validation, and API execution with error handling. Emphasize security, reliability, and iterative refinement based on API feedback.
Pro tip: Always validate the LLM-generated formula against Airtable's formula syntax and test it on a small sample before applying to the live sheet; this prevents costly errors and demonstrates production-ready thinking.
Ask about the expected input format, error tolerance, and whether the formula should be applied to all records or a subset. Confirm the Airtable base/table schema and permissions.
Craft a prompt that includes the user's instruction, the Airtable table schema (field names and types), and examples of valid formulas. Instruct the LLM to output only the formula and handle ambiguity.
Check the generated formula for syntax errors and injection risks. Optionally, use a dry-run endpoint or a test table to verify it works before applying to the live sheet.
Use the Airtable REST API to apply the formula (e.g., via a filterByFormula parameter or update records). Implement retries with exponential backoff for transient errors and log failures.
Provide feedback to the user and log outcomes. If errors occur, refine the prompt or add guardrails, and consider caching successful formulas for similar instructions.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.