← LinkedIn Interview Insights

LinkedIn·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

Intermediate
Apr 2026

Summary

LinkedIn SWE interview with a calendar scheduling design problem. The question had a clean algorithmic core but the follow-up about optimizing to O(log N) with a segment tree is where things got real.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Design a meeting scheduler with two operations: one to record a booking given a start and end time, and another to find the earliest available slot starting from a given time that fits a requested duration without overlapping any existing booking. How do you optimize the lookup?

Algorithms & Data StructuresSystem DesignTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

I got the brute force pretty fast, keep a list, scan everything.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then propose a data structure like a balanced BST or sorted list to store bookings, enabling efficient insertion and lookup. For finding the earliest available slot, consider using a tree to find the first booking after the given time and check gaps, or maintain a separate structure for free slots. Discuss time complexity trade-offs and potential optimizations like interval trees or segment trees.

Pro tip: Mention that real-world systems often use a combination of data structures (e.g., a balanced BST for bookings and a min-heap for free slots) and that concurrency control is crucial for correctness in multi-user scenarios.

1. Clarify requirements and constraints

Ask about expected number of bookings, frequency of operations, concurrency needs, and whether bookings can be modified or cancelled. This guides data structure choice.

2. Design data structure for bookings

Propose using a balanced binary search tree (e.g., Red-Black Tree) or a sorted list (if insertions are infrequent) to store intervals, allowing O(log n) insertion and efficient overlap checks.

3. Algorithm for finding earliest available slot

Given a start time and duration, traverse the tree to find the first booking that ends after the start time, then check if the gap before it fits the duration. If not, move to the next booking and repeat.

4. Optimize lookup with additional structures

Consider maintaining a separate structure for free slots (e.g., a min-heap of gaps) or using an interval tree to quickly query overlapping bookings. Discuss trade-offs in update complexity.

5. Analyze complexity and trade-offs

Compare time complexities: O(log n) for insertion and O(k log n) for lookup where k is number of overlapping bookings. Discuss space-time trade-offs and scalability.

Key Points to Mention

  • Use of balanced BST (e.g., TreeMap in Java) for storing bookings sorted by start time.
  • Handling edge cases: overlapping bookings, back-to-back bookings, zero-duration slots.
  • Time complexity analysis: O(log n) insertion, O(log n + k) lookup where k is number of bookings checked.
  • Alternative approaches: interval trees, segment trees, or maintaining a list of free intervals.
  • Concurrency considerations: locking or optimistic concurrency for multi-threaded environments.
  • Scalability: sharding by time or using distributed systems for large-scale scheduling.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.