← Databricks Interview Insights
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints (throughput, latency, durability, ordering) to frame trade-offs. Then propose a design using a lock-free ring buffer or concurrent queue for producers and a dedicated flusher thread, detailing API, buffering, flush triggers, ordering, shutdown, and crash safety. Conclude by discussing trade-offs and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Emphasize that crash safety requires careful handling of partial writes and fsync ordering; mention using a write-ahead log (WAL) or checksums to detect corruption. Also, highlight that batching and backpressure are key to balancing throughput and latency.
Ask about expected throughput, latency tolerance, durability guarantees (e.g., fsync per entry vs. batch), ordering requirements (global vs. per-thread), and failure scenarios. This shapes the design.
Define a simple API like log(level, message) that is thread-safe. Use a lock-free ring buffer or a concurrent queue (e.g., Michael-Scott queue) to decouple producers from writers, minimizing contention.
Specify when to flush: buffer full, time-based (e.g., every 100ms), or explicit flush call. Use one or more writer threads that drain the buffer and write to durable storage, possibly with batching.
Decide on ordering guarantees (e.g., global sequence numbers or per-thread ordering). Timestamp entries at production time. Implement graceful shutdown by signaling writers to drain and flush before exit.
Use techniques like write-ahead logging, checksums, and atomic writes to handle crashes. Discuss trade-offs between durability, latency, and throughput, and potential optimizations.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.