← Microsoft Interview Insights
I knew union-find was the right call pretty quickly, which felt good.
Use Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union) to dynamically maintain connected components as cells are added. For each operation, mark the cell as land, increment the island count, then union it with any adjacent land cells, decrementing the count for each successful union. This yields near O(1) amortized time per operation.
Pro tip: Mention that Union-Find with union by rank and path compression is optimal here, and contrast it with BFS/DFS which would be O(mn) per operation. Also note that if operations are given offline, you could process them in reverse using Union-Find, but online Union-Find is simpler and equally efficient.
Confirm that operations are given one by one and we need the island count after each. Ask about grid size and number of operations to gauge if O(mn) per operation is acceptable.
Select Union-Find (Disjoint Set Union) with path compression and union by rank/size to efficiently track connected components. Explain why it's better than BFS/DFS for incremental updates.
Initialize a DSU for all cells, a 2D grid to track land, and a counter for islands. For each operation: if cell already land, skip; else mark land, increment count, and for each of the 4 neighbors that is land, union and decrement count on successful union.
Time: O(k * α(mn)) where k is number of operations and α is inverse Ackermann (nearly constant). Space: O(mn). Handle edge cases: duplicate operations, operations on already land cells, and grid boundaries.
Walk through a small example (e.g., 3x3 grid with a few operations) to verify the island count updates correctly. Consider edge cases like all water initially, all land eventually, and isolated cells.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.