This was the whole last 20 minutes and I kind of underestimated how much ground it would cover.
Start by framing the problem around a clear product goal (e.g., building reliable, scalable AI agents for Meta's ecosystem), then walk through each dimension (team, research, infrastructure, evaluation, milestones) in a structured way. Emphasize trade-offs and prioritization, showing how you'd balance long-term research with short-term deliverables.
Pro tip: Tie every decision back to measurable impact and Meta's scale—e.g., how your team structure and evaluation strategy would enable rapid iteration and deployment to billions of users. Show that you understand the difference between research prototypes and production-grade systems.
Clarify the overarching goal of the AI agents team (e.g., build autonomous agents that can assist users across Meta's apps) and define what success looks like (e.g., task completion rate, user engagement, safety metrics).
Outline a cross-functional team including research scientists, ML engineers, infra engineers, product managers, and safety/ethics experts. Explain how you'd structure sub-teams (e.g., research, platform, applications) and the ratio of researchers to engineers.
Identify key research areas (e.g., planning, memory, tool use, multi-agent collaboration) and infrastructure needs (e.g., large-scale training clusters, simulation environments, data pipelines). Explain how you'd allocate resources between exploratory research and scalable infrastructure.
Describe a multi-layered evaluation approach: offline benchmarks, human evaluations, online A/B tests, and red-teaming for safety. Emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and iterative improvement.
Propose a phased roadmap with clear milestones (e.g., 6-month: prototype for internal use; 12-month: limited external beta; 24-month: full-scale deployment). Include checkpoints for research breakthroughs, infrastructure readiness, and safety reviews.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.