← Confluent Interview Insights
My first instinct was a naive scan and I said it out loud before catching myself.
Start by clarifying the problem: define 'occurrence' (e.g., minimal window containing all phrases in order) and whether phrases can overlap. Then propose an inverted index mapping each phrase to its positions, and use a k-way merge with a priority queue to find ordered occurrences efficiently, discussing time and space complexity.
Pro tip: Mention that you would precompute phrase positions and use a min-heap to merge sorted position lists, which naturally enforces order and yields O(N log k) time where N is total occurrences and k is number of phrases. Also note that for very large documents, you might use a compressed index like Lucene's positions format.
Define what constitutes an occurrence (e.g., minimal window, non-overlapping) and confirm if phrases can appear multiple times. Ask about document size and query length to guide design.
Build an inverted index mapping each phrase to a sorted list of its starting positions in the document. For multi-word phrases, use a positional index that stores token positions and then match sequences.
Use a k-way merge with a min-heap over the position lists. Maintain the current position for each phrase; when the smallest position is from phrase 1, check if subsequent phrases have positions greater than the previous, advancing pointers as needed.
Time complexity is O(N log k) where N is total occurrences of all phrases and k is number of phrases, due to heap operations. Space is O(N) for the index and O(k) for the heap.
Consider alternatives like suffix arrays or next-occurrence lists for faster queries, and mention that for very large corpora, distributed indexing (e.g., using Kafka for ingestion) might be relevant.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.