The brute force clicks immediately but they want O(n) so you know a stack is coming.
Recognize this as a classic 'next smaller or equal element' problem and use a monotonic increasing stack to find the next smaller-or-equal price for each item in a single pass. Iterate through the array, maintaining the stack of indices with non-decreasing prices; when the current price is less than or equal to the price at the stack top, pop and apply the discount. This yields O(n) time and O(n) space.
Pro tip: Clarify the discount rule upfront: 'less than or equal to' means equal prices also trigger a discount, so the stack must pop on <=, not just <. Also mention that you can mutate the input array in place to save space, but confirm with the interviewer if that's acceptable.
Restate the problem: for each item, find the first subsequent item with price <= current, subtract it as discount. Confirm edge cases: empty array, single item, all increasing, all equal, and that discounts are applied only once per item.
Recognize this as a 'next smaller or equal element' problem. Explain that a monotonic stack (increasing order of prices) efficiently tracks unresolved items waiting for a smaller-or-equal price.
Iterate through the array with index i. While the stack is non-empty and prices[i] <= prices[stack.top], pop the top index j and set prices[j] -= prices[i]. Then push i onto the stack. After the loop, any remaining indices have no discount.
State that each index is pushed and popped at most once, giving O(n) time and O(n) space. Discuss edge cases: empty array returns empty, single item returns unchanged, and equal prices trigger discounts.
Run through a small example like [8,4,6,2,3] to verify. Mention that the stack can be implemented with a simple array for performance, and that in-place modification is possible if allowed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.