← Snowflake Interview Insights
My first instinct was a straightforward recursive postorder traversal, compute subtree sums in tree one and assign them to tree two simultaneously.
Use a simultaneous post-order traversal of both trees, computing subtree sums from the first tree and writing them into the second tree. Since the trees have identical structure, you can recurse in lockstep, and the recursion stack naturally uses O(h) space.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the O(h) space is due to the recursion stack, and if the tree is skewed, h can be O(n), but the problem allows O(h) space. Also, mention that an iterative approach with an explicit stack would also achieve O(h) space.
Confirm that the trees are complete and have identical structure, and that we need to update the second tree in-place. Note that the solution must be O(n) time and O(h) space.
Select a post-order traversal because subtree sums require children's sums first. Traverse both trees simultaneously to avoid extra space for mapping.
Write a function that takes nodes from both trees. If both are null, return 0. Recursively compute left and right sums from the first tree, set the second node's value to the sum of its left and right sums plus the first node's value, and return that sum.
Explain that each node is visited once, so time is O(n). The recursion depth is the height h, so space is O(h) due to the call stack.
Consider empty trees, single-node trees, and skewed trees. Walk through a small example to verify correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.