← Meta Interview Insights

Meta·Data Scientist·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
Jun 2026Remote

Summary

Meta DS interview with a meaty product ML question that covered basically everything at once. It was one of those sessions where you realize mid-answer that you've bitten off more than you can chew.

Questions Asked (4)

Q1

What business goals and engagement metrics would you track for a restaurant recommendation feature inside a social app?

Product Analytics & MetricsProduct Sense & Ideation
Author's notes

I went straight to click-through rate and kind of stalled there.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the feature's purpose and how it fits into the social app's ecosystem, then define business goals that align with Meta's overarching objectives (e.g., engagement, monetization, growth). Next, translate these goals into measurable engagement metrics, ensuring they capture user interactions with the recommendation feature and its impact on the platform.

Pro tip: Emphasize the importance of balancing short-term engagement metrics with long-term user satisfaction and retention, and mention how you would guard against optimizing for clicks that lead to poor user experiences.

1. Clarify the feature and its context

Ask questions to understand the feature's placement, target users, and how it integrates with existing social interactions. This ensures your goals and metrics are relevant and aligned with the product vision.

2. Define business goals

Identify high-level business objectives such as increasing user engagement, driving restaurant visits or orders, enhancing social connections, and generating revenue through partnerships or ads.

3. Map goals to engagement metrics

For each business goal, propose specific, measurable engagement metrics (e.g., click-through rate, saves, shares, direction requests) that indicate progress toward the goal.

4. Prioritize and set targets

Discuss how to prioritize metrics based on impact and feasibility, and suggest setting targets or benchmarks to evaluate success over time.

5. Consider guardrail metrics

Mention the need for guardrail metrics (e.g., user satisfaction, retention, report rate) to ensure the feature doesn't harm the overall user experience or platform health.

Key Points to Mention

  • Alignment with Meta's business model: driving engagement and monetization through restaurant recommendations.
  • Key engagement metrics: click-through rate (CTR), save rate, share rate, direction requests, and conversion to reservations/orders.
  • Social virality metrics: number of shares to friends, mentions, and subsequent engagement from shared content.
  • User retention and repeat usage: frequency of feature use, return rate, and impact on overall app retention.
  • Guardrail metrics: user satisfaction (e.g., ratings, surveys), report/hide rate, and potential negative impacts on other app features.
  • Segmentation: analyzing metrics by user demographics, location, and social graph to uncover insights and personalize recommendations.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q2

Which behavioral, demographic, and social features would you include in a restaurant recommendation model, and why?

Data ModelingProduct Analytics & Metrics
Author's notes

Talked through past order history, location, cuisine preferences.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Structure your answer by first clarifying the recommendation scenario (e.g., personalized restaurant suggestions for Meta users) and then categorizing features into behavioral, demographic, and social groups. For each category, explain how specific features drive relevance and ranking, and tie them to business metrics like engagement or conversion.

Pro tip: Emphasize that feature selection must balance predictive power with privacy and fairness constraints, especially at Meta's scale—demonstrating awareness of ethical and regulatory considerations will set you apart.

1. Clarify the recommendation context

Define the product surface (e.g., News Feed, Maps, or a dedicated restaurant app) and the objective (e.g., click-through, booking, or satisfaction). This shapes which features are most relevant.

2. Categorize features

Group features into behavioral (user actions), demographic (user attributes), and social (connections and interactions). This ensures comprehensive coverage and logical organization.

3. Select and justify features per category

For each category, propose 2-3 specific features and explain their predictive value. For example, behavioral: past cuisine preferences; demographic: age and location; social: friends' check-ins.

4. Address trade-offs and constraints

Discuss potential issues like data sparsity, privacy regulations, and bias. Explain how you would mitigate them, e.g., using aggregated social signals or fairness-aware modeling.

5. Connect to evaluation and impact

Describe how you would measure feature importance (e.g., offline AUC, online A/B tests) and tie features to business metrics like increased bookings or user retention.

Key Points to Mention

  • Behavioral features: past restaurant visits, cuisine preferences, search history, time-of-day patterns, and engagement with food-related content.
  • Demographic features: age, gender, location (city/neighborhood), income level (if available), and device type, while being mindful of privacy.
  • Social features: friends' restaurant check-ins, likes, reviews, and shared connections to restaurants (e.g., mutual friends who dined there).
  • Contextual features: time, weather, and current location to enhance relevance (e.g., suggesting nearby open restaurants).
  • Privacy and fairness: ensure compliance with regulations (GDPR, CCPA) and avoid reinforcing biases by using aggregated or anonymized social data.
  • Evaluation metrics: offline metrics like precision@k, recall, and NDCG; online metrics like CTR, conversion rate, and user satisfaction.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q3

Which model would you choose for this recommendation problem, and why might logistic regression be a reasonable starting point?

Technical Trade-offsData Modeling
Author's notes

I defaulted to saying 'start simple' which is correct but felt hollow.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the recommendation problem's specifics (e.g., scale, features, latency, business goal) and then propose a model that balances performance and practicality. Explain why logistic regression is a strong baseline due to its simplicity, interpretability, and efficiency, while acknowledging its limitations and when to consider more complex models.

Pro tip: Emphasize that logistic regression provides a fast, interpretable baseline that can be productionized quickly, allowing you to iterate and gather data before investing in complex models. This shows you prioritize business impact and iterative development.

1. Clarify the problem

Ask questions to understand the recommendation task: What is the goal (e.g., click-through rate, conversion)? What data is available? What are the scale and latency requirements?

2. Propose a model

Suggest a model that fits the problem, such as matrix factorization, gradient boosted trees, or neural networks, but highlight logistic regression as a reasonable starting point.

3. Justify logistic regression

Explain why logistic regression is a good baseline: it's simple, fast to train, interpretable, handles sparse features well, and provides a benchmark for more complex models.

4. Discuss trade-offs and next steps

Acknowledge limitations (e.g., inability to capture complex interactions) and outline how to iterate: feature engineering, adding non-linear models, or ensemble methods.

Key Points to Mention

  • Logistic regression as a baseline for binary classification (e.g., click/no-click)
  • Interpretability and ease of debugging
  • Efficiency with large-scale sparse data (e.g., using SGD)
  • Ability to incorporate feature crosses and interactions
  • Limitations: linear decision boundary, may underfit complex patterns
  • Iterative approach: start simple, then move to more complex models like GBDT or deep learning

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.

Q4

How would you evaluate whether your logistic regression model is performing well? Define precision, recall, and accuracy, give their formulas, and explain which metric you'd prioritize for this use case.

Product Analytics & MetricsA/B Testing & Experimentation
Author's notes

This part actually went okay.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by defining precision, recall, and accuracy with their formulas, then discuss how to evaluate a logistic regression model using these metrics, including the confusion matrix and threshold considerations. Finally, explain which metric you would prioritize for the given use case, justifying your choice based on the business context and trade-offs.

Pro tip: Always tie the choice of metric to the business objective and the cost of false positives versus false negatives; for example, in fraud detection, recall is often prioritized to catch as many frauds as possible, even at the expense of precision.

1. Define the metrics

Clearly define precision, recall, and accuracy, and provide their formulas. Precision = TP / (TP + FP), Recall = TP / (TP + FN), Accuracy = (TP + TN) / (TP + TN + FP + FN).

2. Explain evaluation context

Describe how these metrics are derived from the confusion matrix and discuss the impact of class imbalance and decision threshold on model performance.

3. Discuss metric trade-offs

Explain the trade-offs between precision and recall, and how accuracy can be misleading in imbalanced datasets. Mention other metrics like F1-score or AUC-ROC if relevant.

4. Prioritize for the use case

Identify the specific use case (e.g., predicting user engagement, ad click-through, or fraud detection) and justify which metric to prioritize based on the business costs of false positives and false negatives.

5. Conclude with holistic evaluation

Summarize that model evaluation should consider multiple metrics, cross-validation, and business impact, and mention the importance of aligning with stakeholders on the primary metric.

Key Points to Mention

  • Confusion matrix and its components (TP, TN, FP, FN)
  • Formulas for precision, recall, and accuracy
  • Class imbalance and its effect on accuracy
  • Trade-off between precision and recall
  • Business context and cost of errors
  • Alternative metrics like F1-score, AUC-ROC, and precision-recall curve

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.