I jumped straight to 2D DP because it looks exactly like the 0/1 knapsack problem on zeros and ones.
Recognize this as a 0/1 knapsack variant where each string is an item with a cost of (zeros, ones) and a value of 1. Use dynamic programming with a 2D state dp[i][j] representing the maximum subset size achievable with exactly i zeros and j ones, iterating through each string and updating the DP table in reverse to avoid reusing items. Finally, return the maximum value in the DP table for all states where zeros >= m and ones >= n.
Pro tip: Clarify that the DP table can be sized (m+1) x (n+1) by capping counts at m and n, which reduces time and space complexity. Also mention that if the problem asks for 'at least', you can either track exact counts and take the max over the valid region, or modify the DP to track 'at least' directly by saturating counts.
Restate the problem: each string has a cost (zeros, ones) and value 1; we need to maximize the number of strings such that total zeros >= m and total ones >= n. Recognize this as a 2D 0/1 knapsack problem.
Let dp[i][j] be the maximum number of strings that can be chosen with exactly i zeros and j ones. For each string with z zeros and o ones, update dp[i][j] = max(dp[i][j], dp[i-z][j-o] + 1) for i from m down to z and j from n down to o.
Since the requirement is 'at least m zeros and at least n ones', after filling the DP table, the answer is the maximum value of dp[i][j] for all i >= m and j >= n. Alternatively, cap the counts at m and n during DP to directly compute the answer.
Initialize dp with 0 (or -infinity for unreachable states) and iterate through strings. Use a 2D array of size (m+1) x (n+1) and update in reverse order to avoid using the same string multiple times. Time complexity O(L * m * n) where L is number of strings.
Walk through a small example to verify correctness. Consider edge cases: no valid subset, strings with zero zeros or ones, and large m/n relative to total counts.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.