← Jane Street Interview Insights
The 'already tokenized' part is doing a lot of work in this problem.
Use two stacks: one for operands and one for operators, processing tokens left to right while respecting precedence and parentheses. Alternatively, convert the infix expression to postfix (shunting-yard) and evaluate, or use recursive descent parsing. Clearly explain your chosen method, handle edge cases, and analyze time/space complexity.
Pro tip: At Jane Street, they value clean, efficient code and clear communication. Before coding, briefly outline your approach and discuss trade-offs (e.g., two-stack vs. recursive descent) to demonstrate strategic thinking. Also, mention that exact division simplifies handling but still consider integer overflow.
Restate the problem to ensure understanding: tokenized input, operators, parentheses, exact division. Ask about constraints (e.g., input size, integer range) if not provided.
Decide between two-stack evaluation, shunting-yard to postfix, or recursive descent. Consider simplicity, efficiency, and ease of handling parentheses and precedence.
Describe step-by-step how your chosen method works, including how to handle operator precedence, parentheses, and left-to-right associativity.
State time and space complexity (typically O(n)). Discuss edge cases: negative numbers, multi-digit integers, nested parentheses, division by zero (though guaranteed exact), and integer overflow.
Write clean code with meaningful variable names. Walk through a simple example (e.g., ['2', '+', '3', '*', '4']) to verify correctness.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.