← Google Interview Insights

Google·Machine Learning Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Senior

SeniorPass
May 2026

Summary

Google ML Engineer coding round where I had to implement a Transformer with SwiGLU from scratch. Pretty deep dive into the architecture, feedback came back positive so I'll take it.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Implement a Transformer architecture from scratch, including Multi-Head Attention and a SwiGLU-based feed-forward block with a parallel gating mechanism.

System DesignTechnical Trade-offsAlgorithms & Data Structures
Author's notes

This was a full implementation question, not just explain-the-concept.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Start by clarifying the scope and constraints (e.g., framework, performance targets) to tailor your implementation. Then, outline the Transformer architecture, emphasizing Multi-Head Attention and the SwiGLU-based feed-forward block with parallel gating. Finally, discuss trade-offs, optimizations, and potential pitfalls, demonstrating deep understanding.

Pro tip: Mention that you would implement and test each component (e.g., attention, SwiGLU) in isolation before integrating, and use unit tests to verify shapes and gradients. This shows engineering rigor and reduces debugging time.

1. Clarify Requirements and Scope

Ask about the expected framework (e.g., PyTorch, TensorFlow), performance constraints, and whether the implementation should be from scratch or can use library components. This ensures you focus on what matters.

2. Outline the Transformer Architecture

Briefly describe the overall structure: input embedding, positional encoding, N encoder/decoder layers, and output layer. Highlight that you'll focus on Multi-Head Attention and the SwiGLU feed-forward block.

3. Explain Multi-Head Attention Implementation

Detail the steps: linear projections for Q, K, V; splitting into heads; scaled dot-product attention; concatenation and output projection. Mention masking for decoder self-attention and efficient batched matrix multiplication.

4. Describe SwiGLU Feed-Forward with Parallel Gating

Explain SwiGLU: two linear projections (one for gating), Swish activation on the gate, element-wise multiplication, and a final linear projection. For parallel gating, discuss how to compute the gate and value branches in parallel (e.g., using a single matrix multiplication with concatenated weights) for efficiency.

5. Discuss Trade-offs and Optimizations

Cover trade-offs: SwiGLU vs. ReLU/GELU (performance vs. compute), parallel gating vs. sequential (speed vs. memory), and attention optimizations (e.g., FlashAttention, memory-efficient attention). Mention potential pitfalls like numerical stability and gradient issues.

Key Points to Mention

  • Scaled dot-product attention formula and why scaling is needed.
  • Multi-head attention: splitting, parallel computation, and concatenation.
  • SwiGLU activation: Swish(xW + b) * (xV + c), and its benefits over ReLU/GELU.
  • Parallel gating: combining gate and value projections into one matrix multiplication for efficiency.
  • Masking in decoder self-attention to prevent looking ahead.
  • Trade-offs: computational complexity, memory usage, and training stability.

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.