← Pinterest Interview Insights

Pinterest·Software Engineer·Technical Phone Screen·Intermediate

IntermediatePrefer not to say
May 2026

Summary

Pinterest SWE interview with a string/search problem that looks easy until you think about scale. The follow-up on complexity is where it gets interesting.

Questions Asked (1)

Q1

Given a sorted list of words and a list of query prefixes, return for each prefix the index of the first word in the list that starts with that prefix, or -1 if none exists. Then discuss the time complexity of your solution.

Algorithms & Data StructuresTechnical Trade-offs
Author's notes

My first instinct was just linear scan and I almost coded it up before catching myself.

Create a free account to read the full note

AI HintsAI Generated

Suggested Approach

Use binary search to find the first word that is >= each prefix, then check if it starts with the prefix. This leverages the sorted order to achieve O(m log n) time, where m is the number of prefixes and n is the number of words. Discuss the trade-offs of preprocessing (e.g., trie) versus per-query binary search.

Pro tip: Mention that you can optimize by using the built-in bisect module in Python or similar functions in other languages, and highlight that binary search is preferred when the list is static and queries are many. Also, note that if the list is huge and queries are frequent, a trie might be better despite higher memory usage.

1. Clarify assumptions and edge cases

Confirm that the list is sorted lexicographically, prefixes are non-empty strings, and the list may contain duplicates. Discuss handling of empty list or no match.

2. Choose the right algorithm

Decide between binary search per prefix (O(m log n)) and building a trie (O(n * L + m * L)). Justify based on constraints like list size, number of queries, and memory.

3. Implement binary search solution

For each prefix, use binary search to find the leftmost index where the word is >= prefix. Check if that word starts with the prefix; if yes, return index, else -1.

4. Analyze time and space complexity

State that binary search takes O(log n) per prefix, so O(m log n) total, with O(1) extra space. Compare with trie: O(n * L) preprocessing and O(L) per query, but O(n * L) space.

5. Discuss trade-offs and optimizations

Mention that if the list is static and queries are many, binary search is simple and efficient. If queries are frequent and memory allows, a trie can be faster. Also, note that sorting the prefixes or using a batch approach might help.

Key Points to Mention

  • Binary search on sorted list to find first word >= prefix
  • Checking if the found word actually starts with the prefix
  • Time complexity: O(m log n) for m prefixes and n words
  • Space complexity: O(1) extra space for binary search
  • Alternative: Trie for O(L) per query but O(n * L) space
  • Trade-offs: static vs dynamic, memory vs speed, and simplicity

AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.