This is one of those questions where the surface area is so big you have to make a call early: go broad and skim, or go deep and risk missing chunks entirely.
Start by clarifying requirements and scale, then propose a high-level architecture with a scheduler, metadata store, and worker pool. Dive into key components like cron scheduling, DAG execution, retries, idempotency, and fault tolerance, and discuss trade-offs and scaling strategies.
Pro tip: Emphasize idempotency and exactly-once semantics as critical for reliability, and discuss how you'd handle partial failures and duplicate executions. Show awareness of operational concerns like monitoring and alerting from the start.
Ask about job volume, latency requirements, failure handling, and multi-tenancy. Establish assumptions to guide design decisions.
Outline core components: API for job submission, metadata store (e.g., SQL/NoSQL), scheduler, message queue, worker pool, and monitoring. Explain how they interact.
Describe cron-style scheduling using a timing service, and DAG-based dependencies with topological sorting and event-driven triggers. Discuss priority queues for job ordering.
Cover worker assignment (pull vs push), retries with backoff, idempotency via unique job IDs and deduplication, and fault tolerance through heartbeats, leases, and replication.
Explain horizontal scaling of workers and scheduler, partitioning strategies, and monitoring with metrics, logging, and alerting. Discuss trade-offs like consistency vs availability.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.