The function itself isn't that bad once you sit down and think about it.
Start by clarifying requirements and enumerating edge cases (overlapping matches, nested annotations, special characters, multiple annotations for the same substring, and empty inputs). Then propose a robust algorithm that handles these cases, such as interval-based conflict resolution, and discuss trade-offs between simplicity and correctness. Finally, outline a test plan covering normal and edge cases.
Pro tip: Proactively discuss how to handle overlapping matches by defining a clear precedence rule (e.g., longest match wins, or earliest start then longest) and mention that XML escaping of the original text is necessary to avoid invalid output.
Ask questions to understand expected behavior for ambiguous scenarios: overlapping substrings, nested annotations, multiple annotations for the same substring, case sensitivity, and special characters. Confirm the output format and whether XML escaping is required.
Choose an approach that finds all matches, resolves conflicts (e.g., by sorting intervals and selecting non-overlapping ones based on a precedence rule), and then constructs the output string with tags inserted at the correct positions.
Write clean code that handles empty inputs, no matches, and special characters. Ensure that the original text is XML-escaped and that tags are properly nested or non-overlapping as per the chosen rule.
Walk through test cases including simple matches, overlapping matches, nested annotations, multiple annotations for the same substring, and strings with XML special characters. Verify the output is well-formed XML.
Explain the trade-offs of your approach (e.g., time complexity, simplicity vs. handling complex overlaps) and suggest possible extensions like supporting regex or handling nested tags if needed.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.