← Microsoft Interview Insights
My first instinct was to just describe the fill-and-pour steps without thinking about whether X was even achievable.
Model the problem as a state-space search where each state is the amount of water in each jug, and transitions are fill, empty, and pour operations. Use BFS to find the shortest sequence of operations that results in exactly X liters in one jug, and explain the mathematical condition for solvability (X must be a multiple of gcd(A, B) and ≤ max(A, B)).
Pro tip: Mention that this is a classic problem solvable by the Euclidean algorithm, and that BFS guarantees the shortest solution, which is often expected in interviews. Also, clarify any assumptions about X (e.g., X ≤ max(A,B)) before diving into the solution.
Ask if X must be measured in one jug, if jugs can be partially filled, and if X is guaranteed to be achievable. Confirm that operations are limited to filling, emptying, and pouring between jugs.
Explain that X must be a multiple of gcd(A, B) and ≤ max(A, B) for a solution to exist. This shows mathematical insight and avoids wasting time on impossible cases.
Define states as (a, b) where a and b are current amounts in jugs A and B. List possible transitions: fill A, fill B, empty A, empty B, pour A→B, pour B→A.
Use BFS from initial state (0,0) to find the shortest path to any state where a = X or b = X. Explain that BFS guarantees minimal number of operations.
Walk through the sequence of operations for the given A, B, X. Mention time complexity O(A*B) and space complexity O(A*B) for BFS, and note that a more efficient solution exists using the Euclidean algorithm.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.