My first instinct was to just greedily pump up the middle element and call it a day, which is sort of right but not rigorous enough.
First, clarify the problem constraints and edge cases, then propose a binary search on the median value. For a given candidate median, check if it's achievable within k operations by calculating the minimum increments needed to make at least half the elements >= candidate, and ensure the total sum is preserved.
Pro tip: Emphasize that the total sum is invariant, so the median can only be increased by redistributing values from elements below the median to those above. This shows you understand the core constraint and can avoid unnecessary complexity.
Confirm the definition of median (for even length, typically the lower median or average?) and that operations can be applied to any pair of elements. Also confirm that exactly k operations must be used, but extra operations can be wasted by swapping between two elements.
Note that the sum of the array is constant. The goal is to maximize the median, which means we want to raise the lower half of the sorted array as much as possible using the surplus from the upper half.
Binary search the answer over the range of possible medians (from min to max element). For a candidate median m, check if we can make at least half the elements >= m using at most k operations.
For a candidate m, sort the array. Compute the minimum increments needed to make the first half (or the lower median position) >= m. This is sum(max(0, m - a[i])) for the relevant elements. If this sum <= k, then m is feasible.
If the minimum required operations is less than k, we can waste the remaining operations by incrementing one element and decrementing another (e.g., swapping between two elements) without affecting the median. So feasibility only requires min_ops <= k.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.