← Anthropic Interview Insights
I went with BFS mostly out of habit and then had to actually defend it, which I wasn't fully prepared for.
Start by clarifying requirements and constraints, then present a BFS-based crawler using a queue and a visited set to avoid cycles. Explain hostname parsing, error handling, and trade-offs between BFS and DFS, emphasizing politeness and scalability.
Pro tip: Mention that BFS is preferred for level-by-level crawling and early termination, but note that DFS uses less memory; also highlight the importance of respecting robots.txt and rate limiting to avoid overwhelming servers.
Ask about scale, politeness, and whether to respect robots.txt. Confirm that only pages with the same hostname should be crawled.
Select BFS for its level-order traversal, which naturally handles cycles and allows early stopping. Contrast with DFS in terms of memory and use cases.
Use a queue for BFS, a set for visited URLs, and parse hostnames via URL parsing libraries (e.g., urllib.parse). Normalize URLs to avoid duplicates.
Implement try-catch for network errors, timeouts, and invalid URLs. Skip non-HTML content and handle redirects carefully.
Address memory vs. completeness, politeness (rate limiting), and potential improvements like concurrent crawling or distributed systems.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.