The enum definition part tripped me up more than the code itself.
Start by clarifying requirements and defining the payment status enum with all possible states and transitions. Then design the API and data model, ensuring unique payment IDs and correct status updates over time, including handling pending cashbacks and invalid IDs. Finally, discuss trade-offs and potential optimizations.
Pro tip: Explicitly call out idempotency and how you'd handle duplicate pay() calls to avoid double-charging, as this is a common real-world payment system concern. Also, mention that you'd use a time-based simulation or scheduled job to transition statuses, showing awareness of asynchronous processing.
Ask clarifying questions about expected payment lifecycle, cashback timing, and error cases. Define a complete status enum (e.g., IN_PROGRESS, CASHBACK_PENDING, CASHBACK_RECEIVED, INVALID_ID, FAILED) and specify valid transitions.
Define pay() to return a unique payment ID (e.g., UUID) and getPaymentStatus(paymentId) to return the current status. Choose a storage model (in-memory map, database) that supports efficient lookups and updates.
Describe how statuses change over time: e.g., after pay(), status is IN_PROGRESS; after a delay, it becomes CASHBACK_PENDING; after cashback settles, CASHBACK_RECEIVED. Use timestamps or scheduled tasks to trigger transitions.
Ensure getPaymentStatus returns INVALID_ID for unknown IDs. Handle duplicate pay() calls idempotently, and consider concurrency issues if multiple requests update the same payment.
Talk about trade-offs: in-memory vs. persistent storage, synchronous vs. asynchronous status updates, and how the design scales with many payments. Mention potential use of message queues or cron jobs for cashback settlement.
AI-generated suggestions, not part of the candidate's original notes. May be inaccurate — verify before relying on them.